2002PubMedRequires access

[The comparison of efficacy between GP and NP regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer].

Luwen Tian, Zhiming Wang, Difa Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of GP (gemcitabine+cisplatin) and NP (navelbine+cisplatin) regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Seventy-six cases of advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Among them, 36 received GP (gemcitabine 1.0 g/m² D1,8,15+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3), meanwhile 40 were administrated NP regimen (navelbine 30 mg/m² D1,8+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3). RESULTS: The overall response rates of GP and NP were 52.8% and 47.5% respectively (P > 0.05), and the median survivals were 9.8 and 8.7 months respectively (P > 0.05). The main toxicity was hematological toxicity. The incidences of leukopenia were 58.3% and 92.5% in GP and NP respectively (P < 0.01), and those of grade III-IV leukopenia were 16.7% and 52.5% respectively (P < 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in thrombocytopenia incidence between the two groups, however, GP group had a remarkably higher incidence of grade III-IV thrombocytopenia (33.3%) than NP group ( 10.0% ) (P < 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of GP regimen is similar to that of NP and both of them can be well tolerated by patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of GP (gemcitabine+cisplatin) and NP (navelbine+cisplatin) regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Seventy-six cases of advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Among them, 36 received GP (gemcitabine 1.0 g/m² D1,8,15+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3), meanwhile 40 were administrated NP regimen (navelbine 30 mg/m² D1,8+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3). RESULTS: The overall response rates of GP and NP were 52.8% and 47.5% respectively (P > 0.05), and the median survivals were 9.8 and 8.7 months respectively (P > 0.05). The main toxicity was hematological toxicity. The incidences of leukopenia were 58.3% and 92.5% in GP and NP respectively (P < 0.01), and those of grade III-IV leukopenia were 16.7% and 52.5% respectively (P < 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in thrombocytopenia incidence between the two groups, however, GP group had a remarkably higher incidence of grade III-IV thrombocytopenia (33.3%) than NP group ( 10.0% ) (P < 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of GP regimen is similar to that of NP and both of them can be well tolerated by patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of GP (gemcitabine+cisplatin) and NP (navelbine+cisplatin) regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Seventy-six cases of advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Among them, 36 received GP (gemcitabine 1.0 g/m² D1,8,15+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3), meanwhile 40 were administrated NP regimen (navelbine 30 mg/m² D1,8+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3). RESULTS: The overall response rates of GP and NP were 52.8% and 47.5% respectively (P > 0.05), and the median survivals were 9.8 and 8.7 months respectively (P > 0.05). The main toxicity was hematological toxicity. The incidences of leukopenia were 58.3% and 92.5% in GP and NP respectively (P < 0.01), and those of grade III-IV leukopenia were 16.7% and 52.5% respectively (P < 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in thrombocytopenia incidence between the two groups, however, GP group had a remarkably higher incidence of grade III-IV thrombocytopenia (33.3%) than NP group ( 10.0% ) (P < 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of GP regimen is similar to that of NP and both of them can be well tolerated by patients.

Key concepts: Leukopenia, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Lung cancer, Internal medicine, Regimen, Medicine, Toxicity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The comparison of efficacy between GP and NP regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens