[The comparison of efficacy between GP and NP regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer].
Luwen Tian, Zhiming Wang, Difa Liu
Abstract
Luwen Tian, Zhiming Wang, Difa Liu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of GP (gemcitabine+cisplatin) and NP (navelbine+cisplatin) regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Seventy-six cases of advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Among them, 36 received GP (gemcitabine 1.0 g/m² D1,8,15+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3), meanwhile 40 were administrated NP regimen (navelbine 30 mg/m² D1,8+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3). RESULTS: The overall response rates of GP and NP were 52.8% and 47.5% respectively (P > 0.05), and the median survivals were 9.8 and 8.7 months respectively (P > 0.05). The main toxicity was hematological toxicity. The incidences of leukopenia were 58.3% and 92.5% in GP and NP respectively (P < 0.01), and those of grade III-IV leukopenia were 16.7% and 52.5% respectively (P < 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in thrombocytopenia incidence between the two groups, however, GP group had a remarkably higher incidence of grade III-IV thrombocytopenia (33.3%) than NP group ( 10.0% ) (P < 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of GP regimen is similar to that of NP and both of them can be well tolerated by patients.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of GP (gemcitabine+cisplatin) and NP (navelbine+cisplatin) regimens in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Seventy-six cases of advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Among them, 36 received GP (gemcitabine 1.0 g/m² D1,8,15+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3), meanwhile 40 were administrated NP regimen (navelbine 30 mg/m² D1,8+cisplatin 30 mg/m² D1-3). RESULTS: The overall response rates of GP and NP were 52.8% and 47.5% respectively (P > 0.05), and the median survivals were 9.8 and 8.7 months respectively (P > 0.05). The main toxicity was hematological toxicity. The incidences of leukopenia were 58.3% and 92.5% in GP and NP respectively (P < 0.01), and those of grade III-IV leukopenia were 16.7% and 52.5% respectively (P < 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in thrombocytopenia incidence between the two groups, however, GP group had a remarkably higher incidence of grade III-IV thrombocytopenia (33.3%) than NP group ( 10.0% ) (P < 0.05 ). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of GP regimen is similar to that of NP and both of them can be well tolerated by patients.
Key concepts: Leukopenia, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, Lung cancer, Internal medicine, Regimen, Medicine, Toxicity