Public Goods in Trade: On the Formation of Markets and Political Jurisdictions
Alessandra Casella, Jonathan S. Feinstein
Abstract
Open-access reader
Alessandra Casella, Jonathan S. Feinstein
Abstract
Open-access reader
The current debate in Western Europe centers on the relationship between economic and political integration.To address this problem, we construct a simple general equilibrium model in which the returns to trading are directly affected by the availability of a public good.In our model, heterogeneous agents choose both a club and a market to belong to.In the club, agents vote over the public good, are taxed to finance this good, and receive access to it when they trade.In the market, they are randomly matched with a partner.If a match occurs between traders of different clubs, they both suffer a transactions cost.We show that, in general, the political boundaries established by the clubs can be distinct from market borders, leading to international trade between members of different clubs.Further, as the region develops, markets become wider (eventauily leading to a common market) and the desire to avoid transaction costs initially leads to political unification.At still higher levels of development, however, where transaction costs are less important, traders prefer the diversity offered by multiple clubs.
OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The current debate in Western Europe centers on the relationship between economic and political integration.To address this problem, we construct a simple general equilibrium model in which the returns to trading are directly affected by the availability of a public good.In our model, heterogeneous agents choose both a club and a market to belong to.In the club, agents vote over the public good, are taxed to finance this good, and receive access to it when they trade.In the market, they are randomly matched with a partner.If a match occurs between traders of different clubs, they both suffer a transactions cost.We show that, in general, the political boundaries established by the clubs can be distinct from market borders, leading to international trade between members of different clubs.Further, as the region develops, markets become wider (eventauily leading to a common market) and the desire to avoid transaction costs initially leads to political unification.At still higher levels of development, however, where transaction costs are less important, traders prefer the diversity offered by multiple clubs.
Key concepts: Politics, Public good, Business, International trade, International economics, Commerce, Economics, Political science