2000•Journal of researchRequires access

Performance of Pineapple cultivar of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) on different rootstocks.

N. K. Mehrotra, Harish Kumar, V. K. Vij, P S Aulakh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A trial using four rootstocks viz., Jatti Khatti, Kama Khatta, Troyer and Carrizo was planted at Abohar during 1969 for Pineapple - a mid-season cultivar of sweet orange. Results revealed that upto the age of 22 years (1969–1991) the trees on Jatti Khatti excelled all other rootstocks for survival, their health and volume. However, these were on par with Kama Khatta. Troyer and Carrizo in respect of yield. After 1991, these trees declined severely, and by the year 1997 only 41 percent survived out of which only 17 per cent were healthy with least tree volume and fruit yield. The mean fruit yield (1974–1996) on various rootstocks varied from 244 in Carrizo to 271 on Kama Khatta. In the year 1997, maximum tree survival of 92 per cent with 67 per cent healthy trees was noted on Carrizo rootstocks, but tree volume was only 21.0 m3; whereas those on Kama Khatta had 67 per cent survival with 54 per cent healthy trees having mean tree volume (36.0m3) with maximum yield (244 fruits/tree).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A trial using four rootstocks viz., Jatti Khatti, Kama Khatta, Troyer and Carrizo was planted at Abohar during 1969 for Pineapple - a mid-season cultivar of sweet orange. Results revealed that upto the age of 22 years (1969–1991) the trees on Jatti Khatti excelled all other rootstocks for survival, their health and volume. However, these were on par with Kama Khatta. Troyer and Carrizo in respect of yield. After 1991, these trees declined severely, and by the year 1997 only 41 percent survived out of which only 17 per cent were healthy with least tree volume and fruit yield. The mean fruit yield (1974–1996) on various rootstocks varied from 244 in Carrizo to 271 on Kama Khatta. In the year 1997, maximum tree survival of 92 per cent with 67 per cent healthy trees was noted on Carrizo rootstocks, but tree volume was only 21.0 m3; whereas those on Kama Khatta had 67 per cent survival with 54 per cent healthy trees having mean tree volume (36.0m3) with maximum yield (244 fruits/tree).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A trial using four rootstocks viz., Jatti Khatti, Kama Khatta, Troyer and Carrizo was planted at Abohar during 1969 for Pineapple - a mid-season cultivar of sweet orange. Results revealed that upto the age of 22 years (1969–1991) the trees on Jatti Khatti excelled all other rootstocks for survival, their health and volume. However, these were on par with Kama Khatta. Troyer and Carrizo in respect of yield. After 1991, these trees declined severely, and by the year 1997 only 41 percent survived out of which only 17 per cent were healthy with least tree volume and fruit yield. The mean fruit yield (1974–1996) on various rootstocks varied from 244 in Carrizo to 271 on Kama Khatta. In the year 1997, maximum tree survival of 92 per cent with 67 per cent healthy trees was noted on Carrizo rootstocks, but tree volume was only 21.0 m3; whereas those on Kama Khatta had 67 per cent survival with 54 per cent healthy trees having mean tree volume (36.0m3) with maximum yield (244 fruits/tree).

Key concepts: Rootstock, Orange (colour), Cultivar, Citrus × sinensis, Horticulture, Biology, Yield (engineering), Harvest season

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance of Pineapple cultivar of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) on different rootstocks. — Research Paper | ScholarLens