2014•Scholar Science Journals - International Journal of Biomedical ResearchOpen access

A comparative study of haemodynamic responses to intubation: Dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg VS Clonidine 1 µg/kg

Sameer Arora, Hetal Parikh, Shyam Karia, Neha Garg, Rama Upadhyaya

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine (1g/kg) and Clonidine (1g/kg) on hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation, effect on anaesthetic requirements and effect on sedation. Material and Methods: In this prospective double-blind study, 60 patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups Group D ( Inj. Dexmedetomidine dose 1?g/kg iv) and Group C ( Inj. Clonidine dose 1?g/kg iv). Patients belonging to ASA I and ASA II of both sexes aged 20-60 years, were included in this comparative randomized study. Pulse, blood pressure, ECG were monitored continuously and recorded before giving the study drug , after giving the study drug , at intubation then at1,3,5,10 minutes after intubation. Data were analysed and p 0.05 was considered significant. Result: Dexmedetomidine group had 4.70% rise in heart rate at time of intubation and Clonidine group had 9.59% rise which was statistically significant(p 0.05), except during intubation, difference in heart rate between two groups was not significant.(p>0.05)) Group C had significant rise in SBP and DBP during intubation compared to Group D. Maximum rise in SBP and DBP in Group C was 14.53% and 12.84% respectively, whereas in Group D it was 5.55% and 8.90% respectively. Dexmedetomidine group had better sedation than Clonidine group.(p 0.05) Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated the sympathetic response of laryngoscopy and intubation as compared to Clonidine.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine (1g/kg) and Clonidine (1g/kg) on hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation, effect on anaesthetic requirements and effect on sedation. Material and Methods: In this prospective double-blind study, 60 patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups Group D ( Inj. Dexmedetomidine dose 1?g/kg iv) and Group C ( Inj. Clonidine dose 1?g/kg iv). Patients belonging to ASA I and ASA II of both sexes aged 20-60 years, were included in this comparative randomized study. Pulse, blood pressure, ECG were monitored continuously and recorded before giving the study drug , after giving the study drug , at intubation then at1,3,5,10 minutes after intubation. Data were analysed and p 0.05 was considered significant. Result: Dexmedetomidine group had 4.70% rise in heart rate at time of intubation and Clonidine group had 9.59% rise which was statistically significant(p 0.05), except during intubation, difference in heart rate between two groups was not significant.(p>0.05)) Group C had significant rise in SBP and DBP during intubation compared to Group D. Maximum rise in SBP and DBP in Group C was 14.53% and 12.84% respectively, whereas in Group D it was 5.55% and 8.90% respectively. Dexmedetomidine group had better sedation than Clonidine group.(p 0.05) Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated the sympathetic response of laryngoscopy and intubation as compared to Clonidine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine (1g/kg) and Clonidine (1g/kg) on hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation, effect on anaesthetic requirements and effect on sedation. Material and Methods: In this prospective double-blind study, 60 patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups Group D ( Inj. Dexmedetomidine dose 1?g/kg iv) and Group C ( Inj. Clonidine dose 1?g/kg iv). Patients belonging to ASA I and ASA II of both sexes aged 20-60 years, were included in this comparative randomized study. Pulse, blood pressure, ECG were monitored continuously and recorded before giving the study drug , after giving the study drug , at intubation then at1,3,5,10 minutes after intubation. Data were analysed and p 0.05 was considered significant. Result: Dexmedetomidine group had 4.70% rise in heart rate at time of intubation and Clonidine group had 9.59% rise which was statistically significant(p 0.05), except during intubation, difference in heart rate between two groups was not significant.(p>0.05)) Group C had significant rise in SBP and DBP during intubation compared to Group D. Maximum rise in SBP and DBP in Group C was 14.53% and 12.84% respectively, whereas in Group D it was 5.55% and 8.90% respectively. Dexmedetomidine group had better sedation than Clonidine group.(p 0.05) Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated the sympathetic response of laryngoscopy and intubation as compared to Clonidine.

Key concepts: Dexmedetomidine, Clonidine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sedation, Intubation, Laryngoscopy, Hemodynamics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of haemodynamic responses to intubation: Dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg VS Clonidine 1 µg/kg — Research Paper | ScholarLens