2001•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

A Survey of Feminist Economics

Gillian Hewitson

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The roots of the feminist economics which has come, the 1990s, to be widely recognized as in a distinct field of economics are to be found in theoretical developments in both neoclassical economics and in feminist theory from around the 1960s. The aims of this paper are to (1) delineate and discuss the four dominant approaches or schools of thought within feminist economics; (2) show how these schools of thought within feminist economics develop neoclassical economics in ways which enrich rather than undermine it, and (3) show how feminist economics can be distinguished from neoclassical economic analyses of women, such as research denoted as the new home economics undertaken by Chicago-trained economists. In short, the paper seeks to answer the questions What is feminist economics? and What difference does it make?

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The roots of the feminist economics which has come, the 1990s, to be widely recognized as in a distinct field of economics are to be found in theoretical developments in both neoclassical economics and in feminist theory from around the 1960s. The aims of this paper are to (1) delineate and discuss the four dominant approaches or schools of thought within feminist economics; (2) show how these schools of thought within feminist economics develop neoclassical economics in ways which enrich rather than undermine it, and (3) show how feminist economics can be distinguished from neoclassical economic analyses of women, such as research denoted as the new home economics undertaken by Chicago-trained economists. In short, the paper seeks to answer the questions What is feminist economics? and What difference does it make?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The roots of the feminist economics which has come, the 1990s, to be widely recognized as in a distinct field of economics are to be found in theoretical developments in both neoclassical economics and in feminist theory from around the 1960s. The aims of this paper are to (1) delineate and discuss the four dominant approaches or schools of thought within feminist economics; (2) show how these schools of thought within feminist economics develop neoclassical economics in ways which enrich rather than undermine it, and (3) show how feminist economics can be distinguished from neoclassical economic analyses of women, such as research denoted as the new home economics undertaken by Chicago-trained economists. In short, the paper seeks to answer the questions What is feminist economics? and What difference does it make?

Key concepts: Heterodox economics, Schools of economic thought, Applied economics, Positive economics, Human development theory, Mainstream economics, Neoclassical economics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Survey of Feminist Economics — Research Paper | ScholarLens