20058th International Multitopic Conference, 2004. Proceedings of INMIC 2004.Requires access

Digital signature: does it really work for electronic documents?

Minhazul Islam

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Organizations of almost all sizes are discovering the value of "going digital" by converting their office documents to electronic documents. Many of these documents, including financial information, while papers, legal documents, and external communications, require expensive review and mark-up by internal and external workgroups. The main motivations or using PKI (public key infrastructure) in business environment (e.g., e-commerce) is to streamline workflow, by enabling human to digitally sign electronic documents, instead of manually signing paper ones. However, this approach fails if adversaries can construct electronic documents whose viewed contents can change in useful ways, without invalidating the digital signature. In this paper we have examined the space of such attacks, and have described how many popular electronic document formats and PKI packages permit them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Organizations of almost all sizes are discovering the value of "going digital" by converting their office documents to electronic documents. Many of these documents, including financial information, while papers, legal documents, and external communications, require expensive review and mark-up by internal and external workgroups. The main motivations or using PKI (public key infrastructure) in business environment (e.g., e-commerce) is to streamline workflow, by enabling human to digitally sign electronic documents, instead of manually signing paper ones. However, this approach fails if adversaries can construct electronic documents whose viewed contents can change in useful ways, without invalidating the digital signature. In this paper we have examined the space of such attacks, and have described how many popular electronic document formats and PKI packages permit them.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Organizations of almost all sizes are discovering the value of "going digital" by converting their office documents to electronic documents. Many of these documents, including financial information, while papers, legal documents, and external communications, require expensive review and mark-up by internal and external workgroups. The main motivations or using PKI (public key infrastructure) in business environment (e.g., e-commerce) is to streamline workflow, by enabling human to digitally sign electronic documents, instead of manually signing paper ones. However, this approach fails if adversaries can construct electronic documents whose viewed contents can change in useful ways, without invalidating the digital signature. In this paper we have examined the space of such attacks, and have described how many popular electronic document formats and PKI packages permit them.

Key concepts: Public key infrastructure, Digital signature, Electronic signature, Workflow, Computer science, Electronic document, Key (lock), Construct (python library)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Digital signature: does it really work for electronic documents? — Research Paper | ScholarLens