A Pair of Quasi-Inverse Functors for an Extension of Perverse Sheaves
Delphine Dupont
Abstract
Open-access reader
Delphine Dupont
Abstract
Open-access reader
In their article "Elementary construction of perverse sheaves", R.MacPherson and K. Vilonen show that on a Thom-Mather space X the category PervX of perverse sheaves is equivalent to the category C(F, G, T) whose objects are data of perverse sheaves on the complementary of the closed strata S, a local system on S and some gluing data. To show this equivalence of categories, they define a functor C going from the category PervX to the category C(F, G, T). This definition is based on the notion of perverse link. They do not define a quasi-inverse of this functor. moreover they have to consider first the case where S is contractible and then they extend the equivalence to the topological case using the stack theory. In this paper we propose to consider what we call a perverse closed set which is a bit different from a perverse link in order to define a quasi-inverse to the functor C. Moreover we treat directly the topological case without using stack theory.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In their article "Elementary construction of perverse sheaves", R.MacPherson and K. Vilonen show that on a Thom-Mather space X the category PervX of perverse sheaves is equivalent to the category C(F, G, T) whose objects are data of perverse sheaves on the complementary of the closed strata S, a local system on S and some gluing data. To show this equivalence of categories, they define a functor C going from the category PervX to the category C(F, G, T). This definition is based on the notion of perverse link. They do not define a quasi-inverse of this functor. moreover they have to consider first the case where S is contractible and then they extend the equivalence to the topological case using the stack theory. In this paper we propose to consider what we call a perverse closed set which is a bit different from a perverse link in order to define a quasi-inverse to the functor C. Moreover we treat directly the topological case without using stack theory.
Key concepts: Functor, Mathematics, Contractible space, Equivalence (formal languages), Inverse, Extension (predicate logic), Stack (abstract data type), Pure mathematics