1988Unpublished venueOpen access

Stable Riprap Size for Open Channel Flows

Stephen T. Maynord

Open full text 51 citations

Abstract

Channel stabilization Erosion controlRevetments R:1.prap de(dgn Riprap r:evetment is one of the most vlidely used methods for protecting the boundaries of erodible channels, Determining riprap size is one of the most i.mportant steps in the desIgn proc.;ss.Some of the exIsting methods for riprap sizing use the critical shear stress relations and the logarithmic velocity lavm to determine stable rip rap size.Flume data.used in this invest:!.gation silo'\-, that the use of a constant Shields coefficient in the critical ,,[war stre.ssrelations :I.S not valid for relati.veroughness problems like riprap , the velocity laws are not valid for high relative roughness Another limitation of existlng riprap sizing methods is the lack of variation relative to the effects of gradation.thickness, or shape.Usi.ng flume data, 11 riprap sizing method is developed based on aver.agelocal velocity and deptrL Variation in uniformity is descr:tbed by using d 30 as the (Continued)

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Channel stabilization Erosion controlRevetments R:1.prap de(dgn Riprap r:evetment is one of the most vlidely used methods for protecting the boundaries of erodible channels, Determining riprap size is one of the most i.mportant steps in the desIgn proc.;ss.Some of the exIsting methods for riprap sizing use the critical shear stress relations and the logarithmic velocity lavm to determine stable rip rap size.Flume data.used in this invest:!.gation silo'\-, that the use of a constant Shields coefficient in the critical ,,[war stre.ssrelations :I.S not valid for relati.veroughness problems like riprap , the velocity laws are not valid for high relative roughness Another limitation of existlng riprap sizing methods is the lack of variation relative to the effects of gradation.thickness, or shape.Usi.ng flume data, 11 riprap sizing method is developed based on aver.agelocal velocity and deptrL Variation in uniformity is descr:tbed by using d 30 as the (Continued)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Channel stabilization Erosion controlRevetments R:1.prap de(dgn Riprap r:evetment is one of the most vlidely used methods for protecting the boundaries of erodible channels, Determining riprap size is one of the most i.mportant steps in the desIgn proc.;ss.Some of the exIsting methods for riprap sizing use the critical shear stress relations and the logarithmic velocity lavm to determine stable rip rap size.Flume data.used in this invest:!.gation silo'\-, that the use of a constant Shields coefficient in the critical ,,[war stre.ssrelations :I.S not valid for relati.veroughness problems like riprap , the velocity laws are not valid for high relative roughness Another limitation of existlng riprap sizing methods is the lack of variation relative to the effects of gradation.thickness, or shape.Usi.ng flume data, 11 riprap sizing method is developed based on aver.agelocal velocity and deptrL Variation in uniformity is descr:tbed by using d 30 as the (Continued)

Key concepts: Riprap, Channel (broadcasting), Geology, Environmental science, Geotechnical engineering, Computer science, Computer network

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stable Riprap Size for Open Channel Flows — Research Paper | ScholarLens