From Tube and Wing to Flying Wing
Egbert Torenbeek
Abstract
Egbert Torenbeek
Abstract
Selecting the airplane's general arrangement is a complex issue. This chapter deals with finding the optimum allocation of a given useful load volume inside a generic combination of a fuselage and a wing. Although an all-wing airplane is often considered the ultimate ideal, it is not necessarily better than the traditional body and wing concept. For instance, a preferred integrated configuration may combine a body and a wing each containing about 50% of the total volume required for payload and fuel. For a very large airliner, such an integrated concept may be superior to the traditional tube and wing. Results of an analytical approach are illustrated with a parametric survey for a transport aircraft with 2,000 cubic meter useful volume. This leads to the conclusion that all-wing aircraft achieve a high lift to drag ratio only under flight conditions that may not be favorable to a practical design. The analysis is applied to several integrated concepts studied by airplane manufacturers and research institutions. Configurations compared are a discrete wing and body, an all-wing airplane, a blended wing and body, a hybrid flying wing and a very large span loader. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the feasibility of flying wing design.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Selecting the airplane's general arrangement is a complex issue. This chapter deals with finding the optimum allocation of a given useful load volume inside a generic combination of a fuselage and a wing. Although an all-wing airplane is often considered the ultimate ideal, it is not necessarily better than the traditional body and wing concept. For instance, a preferred integrated configuration may combine a body and a wing each containing about 50% of the total volume required for payload and fuel. For a very large airliner, such an integrated concept may be superior to the traditional tube and wing. Results of an analytical approach are illustrated with a parametric survey for a transport aircraft with 2,000 cubic meter useful volume. This leads to the conclusion that all-wing aircraft achieve a high lift to drag ratio only under flight conditions that may not be favorable to a practical design. The analysis is applied to several integrated concepts studied by airplane manufacturers and research institutions. Configurations compared are a discrete wing and body, an all-wing airplane, a blended wing and body, a hybrid flying wing and a very large span loader. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the feasibility of flying wing design.
Key concepts: Wing, Airplane, Fuselage, Wing loading, Wing twist, Aerospace engineering, Wing configuration, Aircraft flight mechanics