2013Unpublished venueRequires access

From Tube and Wing to Flying Wing

Egbert Torenbeek

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Selecting the airplane's general arrangement is a complex issue. This chapter deals with finding the optimum allocation of a given useful load volume inside a generic combination of a fuselage and a wing. Although an all-wing airplane is often considered the ultimate ideal, it is not necessarily better than the traditional body and wing concept. For instance, a preferred integrated configuration may combine a body and a wing each containing about 50% of the total volume required for payload and fuel. For a very large airliner, such an integrated concept may be superior to the traditional tube and wing. Results of an analytical approach are illustrated with a parametric survey for a transport aircraft with 2,000 cubic meter useful volume. This leads to the conclusion that all-wing aircraft achieve a high lift to drag ratio only under flight conditions that may not be favorable to a practical design. The analysis is applied to several integrated concepts studied by airplane manufacturers and research institutions. Configurations compared are a discrete wing and body, an all-wing airplane, a blended wing and body, a hybrid flying wing and a very large span loader. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the feasibility of flying wing design.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Selecting the airplane's general arrangement is a complex issue. This chapter deals with finding the optimum allocation of a given useful load volume inside a generic combination of a fuselage and a wing. Although an all-wing airplane is often considered the ultimate ideal, it is not necessarily better than the traditional body and wing concept. For instance, a preferred integrated configuration may combine a body and a wing each containing about 50% of the total volume required for payload and fuel. For a very large airliner, such an integrated concept may be superior to the traditional tube and wing. Results of an analytical approach are illustrated with a parametric survey for a transport aircraft with 2,000 cubic meter useful volume. This leads to the conclusion that all-wing aircraft achieve a high lift to drag ratio only under flight conditions that may not be favorable to a practical design. The analysis is applied to several integrated concepts studied by airplane manufacturers and research institutions. Configurations compared are a discrete wing and body, an all-wing airplane, a blended wing and body, a hybrid flying wing and a very large span loader. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the feasibility of flying wing design.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Selecting the airplane's general arrangement is a complex issue. This chapter deals with finding the optimum allocation of a given useful load volume inside a generic combination of a fuselage and a wing. Although an all-wing airplane is often considered the ultimate ideal, it is not necessarily better than the traditional body and wing concept. For instance, a preferred integrated configuration may combine a body and a wing each containing about 50% of the total volume required for payload and fuel. For a very large airliner, such an integrated concept may be superior to the traditional tube and wing. Results of an analytical approach are illustrated with a parametric survey for a transport aircraft with 2,000 cubic meter useful volume. This leads to the conclusion that all-wing aircraft achieve a high lift to drag ratio only under flight conditions that may not be favorable to a practical design. The analysis is applied to several integrated concepts studied by airplane manufacturers and research institutions. Configurations compared are a discrete wing and body, an all-wing airplane, a blended wing and body, a hybrid flying wing and a very large span loader. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the feasibility of flying wing design.

Key concepts: Wing, Airplane, Fuselage, Wing loading, Wing twist, Aerospace engineering, Wing configuration, Aircraft flight mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From Tube and Wing to Flying Wing — Research Paper | ScholarLens