The Next Generation of Programming
Juris Reinfelds
Abstract
Open-access reader
Juris Reinfelds
Abstract
Open-access reader
We define programming broadly as the step from specification to runningprogram, which consists in designing the architecture and its abstractionsand coding them into a programming language. Up to now, programming has been taught more as a craft than as an engineering discipline. Usually, programming is taught in the context of one (or a few) programming languages (e.g., Java, complemented with Haskell or Scheme). The historical accidents of the particular languages chosen are so closely interwoven with the fundamental concepts that the two cannot easily be separated. There is confusion between tools and concepts. This has led to different programming communities, based on different programming ‘paradigms’: object-oriented, logic, functional. The unity of programming as a single discipline has been lost. So programsoften suffer from poor design. For instance, concurrency in Java is complex and expensive, so its use is discouraged. So Java taught programmers conclude that concurrency is always complex and expensive.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We define programming broadly as the step from specification to runningprogram, which consists in designing the architecture and its abstractionsand coding them into a programming language. Up to now, programming has been taught more as a craft than as an engineering discipline. Usually, programming is taught in the context of one (or a few) programming languages (e.g., Java, complemented with Haskell or Scheme). The historical accidents of the particular languages chosen are so closely interwoven with the fundamental concepts that the two cannot easily be separated. There is confusion between tools and concepts. This has led to different programming communities, based on different programming ‘paradigms’: object-oriented, logic, functional. The unity of programming as a single discipline has been lost. So programsoften suffer from poor design. For instance, concurrency in Java is complex and expensive, so its use is discouraged. So Java taught programmers conclude that concurrency is always complex and expensive.
Key concepts: Concurrent object-oriented programming, Programming language, Computer science, Functional logic programming, Programming paradigm, Extensible programming, Concurrency, Inductive programming