1996Special reportRequires access

URBAN ROAD CLASSIFICATION AND LOCAL STREET FUNCTION

R E Brindle

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Based on notes written for workshop and seminar participants, the paper focuses on the problem of identifying the functions of roads as a basis for local traffic management schemes and planning new or modified local networks. The conventional terminology usually encountered in Australian practice is identified, and its essential characteristics - that road systems are tributary in character, and that each class is defined by a balance of traffic and access functions - are queried. Conflicts between functions result, even on local streets. In comparison, the two-class separate-function system of classification stresses that any level of traffic distributor must serve minimal access functions, and vice versa. The practical application of such a concept to new and existing networks is discussed. It is suggested that new development should not follow the conventional 'balanced-functions' model which permits normal frontage uses up to quite high levels in the traffic hierarchy. A 'separate functions' model based on UK guidelines is advocated. Thus, frontages to roads serving any traffic distribution function should be minimised. (a) For the covering entry of this report see IRRD 868548.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on notes written for workshop and seminar participants, the paper focuses on the problem of identifying the functions of roads as a basis for local traffic management schemes and planning new or modified local networks. The conventional terminology usually encountered in Australian practice is identified, and its essential characteristics - that road systems are tributary in character, and that each class is defined by a balance of traffic and access functions - are queried. Conflicts between functions result, even on local streets. In comparison, the two-class separate-function system of classification stresses that any level of traffic distributor must serve minimal access functions, and vice versa. The practical application of such a concept to new and existing networks is discussed. It is suggested that new development should not follow the conventional 'balanced-functions' model which permits normal frontage uses up to quite high levels in the traffic hierarchy. A 'separate functions' model based on UK guidelines is advocated. Thus, frontages to roads serving any traffic distribution function should be minimised. (a) For the covering entry of this report see IRRD 868548.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on notes written for workshop and seminar participants, the paper focuses on the problem of identifying the functions of roads as a basis for local traffic management schemes and planning new or modified local networks. The conventional terminology usually encountered in Australian practice is identified, and its essential characteristics - that road systems are tributary in character, and that each class is defined by a balance of traffic and access functions - are queried. Conflicts between functions result, even on local streets. In comparison, the two-class separate-function system of classification stresses that any level of traffic distributor must serve minimal access functions, and vice versa. The practical application of such a concept to new and existing networks is discussed. It is suggested that new development should not follow the conventional 'balanced-functions' model which permits normal frontage uses up to quite high levels in the traffic hierarchy. A 'separate functions' model based on UK guidelines is advocated. Thus, frontages to roads serving any traffic distribution function should be minimised. (a) For the covering entry of this report see IRRD 868548.

Key concepts: Terminology, Function (biology), Class (philosophy), Transport engineering, Hierarchy, Computer science, Roundabout, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
URBAN ROAD CLASSIFICATION AND LOCAL STREET FUNCTION — Research Paper | ScholarLens