Bleeding on probing as it relates to probing pressure and gingival health in patients with a reduced but healthy periodontium
A. Karayiannis, Niklaus P. Lang, Andreas Joss, Sture Nyman
Abstract
A. Karayiannis, Niklaus P. Lang, Andreas Joss, Sture Nyman
Abstract
Abstract A previous study demonstrated that the bleeding on probing (BOP) test using uncontrolled forces may result in a proportion of false positive readings when used as a parameter for inflammation. A strong possibility exists for the traumatization of clinically healthy gingival tissues if a probing force exceeding 0.25 N is applied. While these results originated form young dental hygienists exhibiting excellent oral hygiene, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between probing pressures and gingival conditions in patients with a history of treated periodontal disease, i.e., in situations with a reduced but healthy periodontium. 10 patients who had been enrolled in a periodontal maintenance program following treatment of moderate to advanced chronic inflammatory periodontal disease consented to participate in the study. They were all selected on the basis of a record of excellent oral hygiene practices for at least 2–6 years and almost complete absence of clinical inflammation following sucessful periodontal therapy. Applying a probing force of 0.125, 0.25, 0.375 and 0.5 N in the 4 jaw quadrants, respectively, at 2 different occasions with an interval of 10 days, bleeding on probing was assessed. Oral hygiene and gingival conditions were determined using the criteria of the plaque and gingival index systems. All subjects showed significant increases in mean BOP% with increasing probing force applied (2.5%‐7.9%). Regression analysis revealed an almost linear correlation and a significant correlation coefficient between BOP % and probing force. Almost identical slope inclinations were found when the 6 subjects with the lowest mean BOP % at 0.25 N were compared with the regression analysis of the total group. The results of the present study support the findings of the previous study in healthy dental hygiene students with normal gingival anatomy, namely that the BOP test using uncontrolled forces may result in a proportion of false positive readings for the presence of gingival inflammation. A strong possibility also exists for the traumatization of clinically healthy gingival tissues with reduced support if probing forces exceeding 0.25 N are applied.
OpenAlex reports 77 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract A previous study demonstrated that the bleeding on probing (BOP) test using uncontrolled forces may result in a proportion of false positive readings when used as a parameter for inflammation. A strong possibility exists for the traumatization of clinically healthy gingival tissues if a probing force exceeding 0.25 N is applied. While these results originated form young dental hygienists exhibiting excellent oral hygiene, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between probing pressures and gingival conditions in patients with a history of treated periodontal disease, i.e., in situations with a reduced but healthy periodontium. 10 patients who had been enrolled in a periodontal maintenance program following treatment of moderate to advanced chronic inflammatory periodontal disease consented to participate in the study. They were all selected on the basis of a record of excellent oral hygiene practices for at least 2–6 years and almost complete absence of clinical inflammation following sucessful periodontal therapy. Applying a probing force of 0.125, 0.25, 0.375 and 0.5 N in the 4 jaw quadrants, respectively, at 2 different occasions with an interval of 10 days, bleeding on probing was assessed. Oral hygiene and gingival conditions were determined using the criteria of the plaque and gingival index systems. All subjects showed significant increases in mean BOP% with increasing probing force applied (2.5%‐7.9%). Regression analysis revealed an almost linear correlation and a significant correlation coefficient between BOP % and probing force. Almost identical slope inclinations were found when the 6 subjects with the lowest mean BOP % at 0.25 N were compared with the regression analysis of the total group. The results of the present study support the findings of the previous study in healthy dental hygiene students with normal gingival anatomy, namely that the BOP test using uncontrolled forces may result in a proportion of false positive readings for the presence of gingival inflammation. A strong possibility also exists for the traumatization of clinically healthy gingival tissues with reduced support if probing forces exceeding 0.25 N are applied.
Key concepts: Periodontium, Bleeding on probing, Medicine, Oral hygiene, Dentistry, Gingival and periodontal pocket, Gingival inflammation, Periodontal probe