1984Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., (Pap.); (United States)Requires access

The effects of firing coal-water mixture in oil-designed steam generators

M.J. Hargrove, T.C. Debridge, Gregory N. Liljedahl, R.K. Manfred

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Coal-water mixture fuels have been evaluated as substitutes for oil under an EPRI contract. Loadlimiting factors were determined and operating costs were estimated for four utility units. Four typical steam generators designed for oil firing, ranging from 400 to 850 MW, built by three manufacturers, were analyzed. Two different CWM's were assumed to be fired. The analyses showed load deratings ranged from 15 to 62 percent. Retrofit modifications for the study boilers included new furnace bottoms, furnace wall deslaggers, burner components, and fly ash hoppers. Balance of plant modifications included fuel handling and ash removal systems. An evaluation of the retrofit costs versus the fuel cost savings showed that CWS is an economical fuel for converting utility steam generators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Coal-water mixture fuels have been evaluated as substitutes for oil under an EPRI contract. Loadlimiting factors were determined and operating costs were estimated for four utility units. Four typical steam generators designed for oil firing, ranging from 400 to 850 MW, built by three manufacturers, were analyzed. Two different CWM's were assumed to be fired. The analyses showed load deratings ranged from 15 to 62 percent. Retrofit modifications for the study boilers included new furnace bottoms, furnace wall deslaggers, burner components, and fly ash hoppers. Balance of plant modifications included fuel handling and ash removal systems. An evaluation of the retrofit costs versus the fuel cost savings showed that CWS is an economical fuel for converting utility steam generators.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Coal-water mixture fuels have been evaluated as substitutes for oil under an EPRI contract. Loadlimiting factors were determined and operating costs were estimated for four utility units. Four typical steam generators designed for oil firing, ranging from 400 to 850 MW, built by three manufacturers, were analyzed. Two different CWM's were assumed to be fired. The analyses showed load deratings ranged from 15 to 62 percent. Retrofit modifications for the study boilers included new furnace bottoms, furnace wall deslaggers, burner components, and fly ash hoppers. Balance of plant modifications included fuel handling and ash removal systems. An evaluation of the retrofit costs versus the fuel cost savings showed that CWS is an economical fuel for converting utility steam generators.

Key concepts: Waste management, Boiler (water heating), Coal, Combustor, Fuel oil, Environmental science, Engineering, Fly ash

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effects of firing coal-water mixture in oil-designed steam generators — Research Paper | ScholarLens