1984OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Assessment of options for a 20- to 30-MW(e) lignite-fueled cogeneration power plant. Final report

G.J. Arvay, J.A. de la Mora, J.R. Grisso, H.W. Klumpe, Margaret M. Lobnitz, Antonio Musso, T.R. Roszkowski, Richard E. Warner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Plant designs, performance data, cost estimates and bus-bar power costs were developed for four configurations of small-scale cogeneration plants using lignite as fuel. The configurations evaluated consisted of lignite gasification combined with phosphoric acid fuel cells, lignite gasification with a combustion turbine generator, a direct-fired atmospheric fluidized bed boiler plant, and a direct-fired conventional boiler plant. The plants were sized on the basis of the same lignite feed of 740 TPD and production of 100,000 lbs per hr of process steam for industrial use. Results in terms of net electrical power output and bus-bar power costs in constant 1983 dollars were: for the gasification/fuel cell plant, 32.5MW and $0.068 kWh; for the gasification/combustion turbine plant, 20.1MW and $0.081 per kWh; for the fluidized bed boiler plant, 20.6MW and $0.074 per kWh; and for the conventional direct-fired boiler plant, 21.2MW and $0.066 per kWh.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Plant designs, performance data, cost estimates and bus-bar power costs were developed for four configurations of small-scale cogeneration plants using lignite as fuel. The configurations evaluated consisted of lignite gasification combined with phosphoric acid fuel cells, lignite gasification with a combustion turbine generator, a direct-fired atmospheric fluidized bed boiler plant, and a direct-fired conventional boiler plant. The plants were sized on the basis of the same lignite feed of 740 TPD and production of 100,000 lbs per hr of process steam for industrial use. Results in terms of net electrical power output and bus-bar power costs in constant 1983 dollars were: for the gasification/fuel cell plant, 32.5MW and $0.068 kWh; for the gasification/combustion turbine plant, 20.1MW and $0.081 per kWh; for the fluidized bed boiler plant, 20.6MW and $0.074 per kWh; and for the conventional direct-fired boiler plant, 21.2MW and $0.066 per kWh.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Plant designs, performance data, cost estimates and bus-bar power costs were developed for four configurations of small-scale cogeneration plants using lignite as fuel. The configurations evaluated consisted of lignite gasification combined with phosphoric acid fuel cells, lignite gasification with a combustion turbine generator, a direct-fired atmospheric fluidized bed boiler plant, and a direct-fired conventional boiler plant. The plants were sized on the basis of the same lignite feed of 740 TPD and production of 100,000 lbs per hr of process steam for industrial use. Results in terms of net electrical power output and bus-bar power costs in constant 1983 dollars were: for the gasification/fuel cell plant, 32.5MW and $0.068 kWh; for the gasification/combustion turbine plant, 20.1MW and $0.081 per kWh; for the fluidized bed boiler plant, 20.6MW and $0.074 per kWh; and for the conventional direct-fired boiler plant, 21.2MW and $0.066 per kWh.

Key concepts: Cogeneration, Waste management, Power station, Boiler (water heating), Engineering, Combustion, Fluidized bed combustion, Pilot plant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of options for a 20- to 30-MW(e) lignite-fueled cogeneration power plant. Final report — Research Paper | ScholarLens