2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Counterpart and Appreciation Theodicies

Justin P. McBrayer

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all-things-considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy says that good cannot exist without evil, and so God must allow evil in order to allow good. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. The appreciation theodicy says that we would be unable to know/recognize/appreciate the good without evil, and so God is forced to allow evil in order to allow for such appreciation. The appreciation theodicy relies on an epistemological claim about recognition or appreciation. Despite the widespread acceptance of these theodicies in certain circles, neither meets the conditions of a successful theodicy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all-things-considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy says that good cannot exist without evil, and so God must allow evil in order to allow good. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. The appreciation theodicy says that we would be unable to know/recognize/appreciate the good without evil, and so God is forced to allow evil in order to allow for such appreciation. The appreciation theodicy relies on an epistemological claim about recognition or appreciation. Despite the widespread acceptance of these theodicies in certain circles, neither meets the conditions of a successful theodicy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all-things-considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy says that good cannot exist without evil, and so God must allow evil in order to allow good. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. The appreciation theodicy says that we would be unable to know/recognize/appreciate the good without evil, and so God is forced to allow evil in order to allow for such appreciation. The appreciation theodicy relies on an epistemological claim about recognition or appreciation. Despite the widespread acceptance of these theodicies in certain circles, neither meets the conditions of a successful theodicy.

Key concepts: Theodicy, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Epistemology, Order (exchange), Economics, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Counterpart and Appreciation Theodicies — Research Paper | ScholarLens