2010Social and Personality Psychology CompassRequires access

Good, Better, Best: Between Culture and Self‐Enhancement

Jenny Kurman

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Abstract The topic of self‐enhancement and culture is discussed. The question of the universality of the self‐enhancement motive, well‐documented in the West, inspired a lively debate, pertaining mainly to the existence of a self‐enhancement motive in East‐Asian cultures. The present paper presents some major findings that challenge the basic assumption of and of that the self‐enhancement motive does not exist in East‐Asian cultures. These findings relate to the following issues: self‐enhancement in East‐Asia in culturally accepted domains; the role of modesty in self‐enhancement; relevance of anonymity to self‐enhancement manifestation; self‐enhancement done by significant others; implicit measures of self‐esteem; and the relations between well‐being and self‐enhancement in East‐Asia. Some common beliefs, that self‐enhancement inhibits self‐improvement and that low uniqueness implies low self‐enhancement are discussed and questioned. The paper suggests that the controversy regarding the self‐enhancement motive may boil down to the question of the degree to which the social norms regarding restrictions on self‐success are internalized in a culture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The topic of self‐enhancement and culture is discussed. The question of the universality of the self‐enhancement motive, well‐documented in the West, inspired a lively debate, pertaining mainly to the existence of a self‐enhancement motive in East‐Asian cultures. The present paper presents some major findings that challenge the basic assumption of and of that the self‐enhancement motive does not exist in East‐Asian cultures. These findings relate to the following issues: self‐enhancement in East‐Asia in culturally accepted domains; the role of modesty in self‐enhancement; relevance of anonymity to self‐enhancement manifestation; self‐enhancement done by significant others; implicit measures of self‐esteem; and the relations between well‐being and self‐enhancement in East‐Asia. Some common beliefs, that self‐enhancement inhibits self‐improvement and that low uniqueness implies low self‐enhancement are discussed and questioned. The paper suggests that the controversy regarding the self‐enhancement motive may boil down to the question of the degree to which the social norms regarding restrictions on self‐success are internalized in a culture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The topic of self‐enhancement and culture is discussed. The question of the universality of the self‐enhancement motive, well‐documented in the West, inspired a lively debate, pertaining mainly to the existence of a self‐enhancement motive in East‐Asian cultures. The present paper presents some major findings that challenge the basic assumption of and of that the self‐enhancement motive does not exist in East‐Asian cultures. These findings relate to the following issues: self‐enhancement in East‐Asia in culturally accepted domains; the role of modesty in self‐enhancement; relevance of anonymity to self‐enhancement manifestation; self‐enhancement done by significant others; implicit measures of self‐esteem; and the relations between well‐being and self‐enhancement in East‐Asia. Some common beliefs, that self‐enhancement inhibits self‐improvement and that low uniqueness implies low self‐enhancement are discussed and questioned. The paper suggests that the controversy regarding the self‐enhancement motive may boil down to the question of the degree to which the social norms regarding restrictions on self‐success are internalized in a culture.

Key concepts: Self-enhancement, Self, Universality (dynamical systems), Psychology, Social psychology, Anonymity, Human enhancement, Performance enhancement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Good, Better, Best: Between Culture and Self‐Enhancement — Research Paper | ScholarLens