1997Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyRequires access

Self-Enhancement, Generality of Self-Evaluation, and Affectivity in Israel and Singapore

Jenny Kurman, N. Sriram

Open publisher page 53 citations

Abstract

Previous findings from Israel show that self-evaluations are more positive than objective criteria and that they become more positive at more general levels of self-evaluation (Kurman & Eshel, 1996). This article examines whether this manifestation of self-enhancement exists in a more collectivistic culture. Academic self-evaluations obtained from eighth graders in Singapore and Israel revealed self-enhancement in both cultures. For Israelis, there was a trend of increasing self-enhancement at more general levels of self-evaluation. In contrast, the magnitude of Singaporeans' self-enhancement was not influenced by the generality of self-evaluation. Self-enhancement was positively related to well-being and self-esteem in both cultures. Taken together, the findings suggest that the weaker self-enhancement in Singapore does not necessarily imply the absence of the self-enhancement motive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Previous findings from Israel show that self-evaluations are more positive than objective criteria and that they become more positive at more general levels of self-evaluation (Kurman & Eshel, 1996). This article examines whether this manifestation of self-enhancement exists in a more collectivistic culture. Academic self-evaluations obtained from eighth graders in Singapore and Israel revealed self-enhancement in both cultures. For Israelis, there was a trend of increasing self-enhancement at more general levels of self-evaluation. In contrast, the magnitude of Singaporeans' self-enhancement was not influenced by the generality of self-evaluation. Self-enhancement was positively related to well-being and self-esteem in both cultures. Taken together, the findings suggest that the weaker self-enhancement in Singapore does not necessarily imply the absence of the self-enhancement motive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Previous findings from Israel show that self-evaluations are more positive than objective criteria and that they become more positive at more general levels of self-evaluation (Kurman & Eshel, 1996). This article examines whether this manifestation of self-enhancement exists in a more collectivistic culture. Academic self-evaluations obtained from eighth graders in Singapore and Israel revealed self-enhancement in both cultures. For Israelis, there was a trend of increasing self-enhancement at more general levels of self-evaluation. In contrast, the magnitude of Singaporeans' self-enhancement was not influenced by the generality of self-evaluation. Self-enhancement was positively related to well-being and self-esteem in both cultures. Taken together, the findings suggest that the weaker self-enhancement in Singapore does not necessarily imply the absence of the self-enhancement motive.

Key concepts: Self-enhancement, Collectivism, Self improvement, Generality, Self evaluation, Psychology, Self, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Self-Enhancement, Generality of Self-Evaluation, and Affectivity in Israel and Singapore — Research Paper | ScholarLens