2012PubMedRequires access

EVAR for aortoiliac aneurysms, including iliac branched grafts.

Kosmas I. Paraskevas, K Paraskevas, C Möllendorf, E Fernandes, Ruy Fernandes e Fernandes, Ruy Fernandes e Fernandes, Ignace F.J. Tielliu, I Tielliu, E L G Verhoeven, Eric Verhoeven

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

For aortoiliac aneurysms involving the common iliac arteries several treatment options have been developed. In the early stages of the endovascular era the internal iliac artery was usually overstented with or without embolization. Thereafter relocation or bypass techniques were used in an attempt to preserve the internal iliac artery. Then endovascular techniques were used that involved the need for a femoro-femoral cross-over bypass. The development of iliac branched devices made it possible to preserve the internal iliac artery by endovascular means only. A first version of the iliac bifurcated graft needed to be pulled into the internal iliac artery but this technique proved too difficult. Newer versions including straight side-branches or helical side-branches for the internal iliac artery require a cross-over catheterization and introduction of a stent-graft to bridge the gap between the internal iliac artery and the iliac branch. Anatomical criteria including sufficient length of the common iliac artery and a normal calibre internal iliac artery should be taken into account, but also the health status of the patient, before one decides to use an iliac branched device for a patient with an aortoiliac aneurysm. Additional costs and technical challenges need to be balanced with the potential benefits for active patients who would be at risk for buttock claudication.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For aortoiliac aneurysms involving the common iliac arteries several treatment options have been developed. In the early stages of the endovascular era the internal iliac artery was usually overstented with or without embolization. Thereafter relocation or bypass techniques were used in an attempt to preserve the internal iliac artery. Then endovascular techniques were used that involved the need for a femoro-femoral cross-over bypass. The development of iliac branched devices made it possible to preserve the internal iliac artery by endovascular means only. A first version of the iliac bifurcated graft needed to be pulled into the internal iliac artery but this technique proved too difficult. Newer versions including straight side-branches or helical side-branches for the internal iliac artery require a cross-over catheterization and introduction of a stent-graft to bridge the gap between the internal iliac artery and the iliac branch. Anatomical criteria including sufficient length of the common iliac artery and a normal calibre internal iliac artery should be taken into account, but also the health status of the patient, before one decides to use an iliac branched device for a patient with an aortoiliac aneurysm. Additional costs and technical challenges need to be balanced with the potential benefits for active patients who would be at risk for buttock claudication.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For aortoiliac aneurysms involving the common iliac arteries several treatment options have been developed. In the early stages of the endovascular era the internal iliac artery was usually overstented with or without embolization. Thereafter relocation or bypass techniques were used in an attempt to preserve the internal iliac artery. Then endovascular techniques were used that involved the need for a femoro-femoral cross-over bypass. The development of iliac branched devices made it possible to preserve the internal iliac artery by endovascular means only. A first version of the iliac bifurcated graft needed to be pulled into the internal iliac artery but this technique proved too difficult. Newer versions including straight side-branches or helical side-branches for the internal iliac artery require a cross-over catheterization and introduction of a stent-graft to bridge the gap between the internal iliac artery and the iliac branch. Anatomical criteria including sufficient length of the common iliac artery and a normal calibre internal iliac artery should be taken into account, but also the health status of the patient, before one decides to use an iliac branched device for a patient with an aortoiliac aneurysm. Additional costs and technical challenges need to be balanced with the potential benefits for active patients who would be at risk for buttock claudication.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal iliac artery, External iliac artery, Common iliac artery, Surgery, Radiology, Iliac artery, Stent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVAR for aortoiliac aneurysms, including iliac branched grafts. — Research Paper | ScholarLens