The assessment of the clinical significance of inter-arm blood pressure difference and depression in general practice: A health initiative cross sectional study
Somchai Nathapindhu, Ganjana Nathapindhu, Charuwan Nippanon, Bussaba Chanpong
Abstract
Somchai Nathapindhu, Ganjana Nathapindhu, Charuwan Nippanon, Bussaba Chanpong
Abstract
Introduction and aim: Blood pressure (BP) recordings often differ between arms. This study is aimed to observe the presence of inter-arm blood pressure difference and association with depression. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at Sri Aurobindo Medical College & P. G. Institute, Indore, India among 477 patients. Ethical approval was obtained from IREC. The age, height, weight, history of disease, blood pressure in both arms and depression level were recorded. Results: Absolute Inter-arm Difference (AID) was present in SBP of 80.5%, DBP of 74.8% and found >10 mm Hg in SBP of 5.0% while in DBP of 3.8%. Increase in the AID was measured strongly (p<0.001) significant. The levels of depression were strongly (p<0.001) associated with AID in SBP and DBP. The Mean DS was very high (65.60±19.11) and 48.2% patients had severe depression. The average left and right; SBP were 131.3±18.50 and 129.8±17.00 mm Hg respectively; while DBP were 84.84±10.90 and 83.77±9.70 mm Hg respectively. A significant (p<0.001) correlation is observed for Inter-arm blood pressure for SBP and DBP. SBP was moderately while DBP was fairly correlated with age; BMI and depression score. Conclusions: The presence of Inter-arm blood pressure difference may be regarded as a simple marker for diseases. Severe depression may be used as a simple indicator of increased disease risk and a contributory factor, delaying the diagnosis. Abbreviation: IREC:-Institutional Research & Ethical Committee, AID:-Absolute Inter-arm Difference, SBP:-Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP:-Diastolic Blood Pressure, DS:-Depression Score and BMI:-Body Mass Index.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Introduction and aim: Blood pressure (BP) recordings often differ between arms. This study is aimed to observe the presence of inter-arm blood pressure difference and association with depression. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at Sri Aurobindo Medical College & P. G. Institute, Indore, India among 477 patients. Ethical approval was obtained from IREC. The age, height, weight, history of disease, blood pressure in both arms and depression level were recorded. Results: Absolute Inter-arm Difference (AID) was present in SBP of 80.5%, DBP of 74.8% and found >10 mm Hg in SBP of 5.0% while in DBP of 3.8%. Increase in the AID was measured strongly (p<0.001) significant. The levels of depression were strongly (p<0.001) associated with AID in SBP and DBP. The Mean DS was very high (65.60±19.11) and 48.2% patients had severe depression. The average left and right; SBP were 131.3±18.50 and 129.8±17.00 mm Hg respectively; while DBP were 84.84±10.90 and 83.77±9.70 mm Hg respectively. A significant (p<0.001) correlation is observed for Inter-arm blood pressure for SBP and DBP. SBP was moderately while DBP was fairly correlated with age; BMI and depression score. Conclusions: The presence of Inter-arm blood pressure difference may be regarded as a simple marker for diseases. Severe depression may be used as a simple indicator of increased disease risk and a contributory factor, delaying the diagnosis. Abbreviation: IREC:-Institutional Research & Ethical Committee, AID:-Absolute Inter-arm Difference, SBP:-Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP:-Diastolic Blood Pressure, DS:-Depression Score and BMI:-Body Mass Index.
Key concepts: Blood pressure, Depression (economics), Medicine, Internal medicine, Cross-sectional study, Significant difference, Pathology, Macroeconomics