2010International Journal of CrashworthinessRequires access

Comparative Evaluation of the THOR Advanced Frontal Crash Test Dummy

C. Gregory Shaw, Jeffrey Richard Crandall, J Butcher

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Ten 48 km/h frontal sled tests were conducted to evaluate the biofidelity of the THOR dummy. Three replicate tests were conducted with THOR, three with a 50 th percentile male Hybrid III dummy, and four with post-mortem human surrogates (PMHS). The tests, conducted in a buck representing a mid-size US sedan, included a force-limited three-point belt system with buckle-side pretensioner and a driver side airbag. Following the tests, select parameters were used to compare THOR's responses with those of the Hybrid III dummy and the PMHS. The tesults were mass scaled in order to account for size differences between the subjects. Based on cadaveric response corridors, the sled test results provided evidence that THOR is more biofidelic than the Hybrid III dummy. THOR lap belt loads, head acceleration, and movement of the anterior chest wall were more similar to those of the PMHS than were those of the Hybrid III. However, THOR recorded less head forward movement and pelvic acceleration than did the PMHS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Ten 48 km/h frontal sled tests were conducted to evaluate the biofidelity of the THOR dummy. Three replicate tests were conducted with THOR, three with a 50 th percentile male Hybrid III dummy, and four with post-mortem human surrogates (PMHS). The tests, conducted in a buck representing a mid-size US sedan, included a force-limited three-point belt system with buckle-side pretensioner and a driver side airbag. Following the tests, select parameters were used to compare THOR's responses with those of the Hybrid III dummy and the PMHS. The tesults were mass scaled in order to account for size differences between the subjects. Based on cadaveric response corridors, the sled test results provided evidence that THOR is more biofidelic than the Hybrid III dummy. THOR lap belt loads, head acceleration, and movement of the anterior chest wall were more similar to those of the PMHS than were those of the Hybrid III. However, THOR recorded less head forward movement and pelvic acceleration than did the PMHS.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Ten 48 km/h frontal sled tests were conducted to evaluate the biofidelity of the THOR dummy. Three replicate tests were conducted with THOR, three with a 50 th percentile male Hybrid III dummy, and four with post-mortem human surrogates (PMHS). The tests, conducted in a buck representing a mid-size US sedan, included a force-limited three-point belt system with buckle-side pretensioner and a driver side airbag. Following the tests, select parameters were used to compare THOR's responses with those of the Hybrid III dummy and the PMHS. The tesults were mass scaled in order to account for size differences between the subjects. Based on cadaveric response corridors, the sled test results provided evidence that THOR is more biofidelic than the Hybrid III dummy. THOR lap belt loads, head acceleration, and movement of the anterior chest wall were more similar to those of the PMHS than were those of the Hybrid III. However, THOR recorded less head forward movement and pelvic acceleration than did the PMHS.

Key concepts: Hybrid III, Crash test, Small arms, Airbag, Cadaveric spasm, Acceleration, Poison control, Crash

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Evaluation of the THOR Advanced Frontal Crash Test Dummy — Research Paper | ScholarLens