2011•ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)Requires access

De-politicising poverty : Arendt in South Africa

Emilios Christodoulidis

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The article argues against significant structuring effect of distinction between and as it informs theories of constitutionalism, and with specific reference to South Africa. The distinction underlies constitutional separation of from socio-economic constitutionalism and concerns directly social question, or, in other words, question of poverty. The article traces distinction back to theory of Hannah Arendt that has been so extraordinarily influential to conceptualisation of the political today. It argues that distinction / is not incidental but instead constitutive of way in which Arendt offers a phenomenology of political, on back, as it were, of exclusion of social. The article argues that leverage that this separation offers to imaginary comes at a crucial cost, because it diminishes power of and economic rights to offer redress to continuing devastating effects of poverty in South Africa, and across countries of South.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article argues against significant structuring effect of distinction between and as it informs theories of constitutionalism, and with specific reference to South Africa. The distinction underlies constitutional separation of from socio-economic constitutionalism and concerns directly social question, or, in other words, question of poverty. The article traces distinction back to theory of Hannah Arendt that has been so extraordinarily influential to conceptualisation of the political today. It argues that distinction / is not incidental but instead constitutive of way in which Arendt offers a phenomenology of political, on back, as it were, of exclusion of social. The article argues that leverage that this separation offers to imaginary comes at a crucial cost, because it diminishes power of and economic rights to offer redress to continuing devastating effects of poverty in South Africa, and across countries of South.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article argues against significant structuring effect of distinction between and as it informs theories of constitutionalism, and with specific reference to South Africa. The distinction underlies constitutional separation of from socio-economic constitutionalism and concerns directly social question, or, in other words, question of poverty. The article traces distinction back to theory of Hannah Arendt that has been so extraordinarily influential to conceptualisation of the political today. It argues that distinction / is not incidental but instead constitutive of way in which Arendt offers a phenomenology of political, on back, as it were, of exclusion of social. The article argues that leverage that this separation offers to imaginary comes at a crucial cost, because it diminishes power of and economic rights to offer redress to continuing devastating effects of poverty in South Africa, and across countries of South.

Key concepts: Constitutionalism, Poverty, Redress, Politics, Political philosophy, Sociology, Political science, Political economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
De-politicising poverty : Arendt in South Africa — Research Paper | ScholarLens