1981•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

The Structure of Political Community

Bhikhu Parekh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Like other political philosophers, Arendt makes the obvious point that a political community needs a distinct territory of its own, but on novel grounds. She argues that just as most political philosophers explained the origin and continuance of the state in ‘materialistic’ terms, they maintained that it needs a territory in order to enable its members to secure their basic material needs. In Arendt’s view, such a naturalistic account ignores the political and ontological significance of territory and is unsatisfactory for several reasons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Like other political philosophers, Arendt makes the obvious point that a political community needs a distinct territory of its own, but on novel grounds. She argues that just as most political philosophers explained the origin and continuance of the state in ‘materialistic’ terms, they maintained that it needs a territory in order to enable its members to secure their basic material needs. In Arendt’s view, such a naturalistic account ignores the political and ontological significance of territory and is unsatisfactory for several reasons.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Like other political philosophers, Arendt makes the obvious point that a political community needs a distinct territory of its own, but on novel grounds. She argues that just as most political philosophers explained the origin and continuance of the state in ‘materialistic’ terms, they maintained that it needs a territory in order to enable its members to secure their basic material needs. In Arendt’s view, such a naturalistic account ignores the political and ontological significance of territory and is unsatisfactory for several reasons.

Key concepts: Materialism, Politics, Continuance, Order (exchange), Epistemology, State (computer science), Environmental ethics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Structure of Political Community — Research Paper | ScholarLens