2002•Sculpture JournalRequires access

Victor Pasmore’s Peterlee Pavilion and the ‘publicness’ of public sculpture

Paul Usherwood

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Focusing on the particular case of Victor Pasmore’s Apollo Pavilion at Peterlee New Town in Co. Durham (completed 1970), this article looks at the problem of how to deal with a piece of public art once vandalism, officially sanctioned modifications and changes to the setting have begun to take their toll. Noting that public art is really only effective when it sparks public engagement and debate, it takes the unusual approach of looking methodically at the way different groups, both local and non-local, have responded to a specific piece over two decades and concludes that there are circumstances when, paradoxically, a piece of public art may be best served by being destroyed. It draws on primary research The article was developed from a paper delivered at the symposium, Model Forms, Henry Moore Institute, Leeds, November 2002 which in turn was developed from an article, ‘Pasmore’s Pavilion at Peterlee’, Building Design, 9 November, 2001 It is part of Usherwood’s ongoing interest in issues connected with the meaning, function and physical care of public monuments which springs from research for the book Public Sculpture of North-East England (Usherwood, Beach and Morris, Liverpool University Press, 2000).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Focusing on the particular case of Victor Pasmore’s Apollo Pavilion at Peterlee New Town in Co. Durham (completed 1970), this article looks at the problem of how to deal with a piece of public art once vandalism, officially sanctioned modifications and changes to the setting have begun to take their toll. Noting that public art is really only effective when it sparks public engagement and debate, it takes the unusual approach of looking methodically at the way different groups, both local and non-local, have responded to a specific piece over two decades and concludes that there are circumstances when, paradoxically, a piece of public art may be best served by being destroyed. It draws on primary research The article was developed from a paper delivered at the symposium, Model Forms, Henry Moore Institute, Leeds, November 2002 which in turn was developed from an article, ‘Pasmore’s Pavilion at Peterlee’, Building Design, 9 November, 2001 It is part of Usherwood’s ongoing interest in issues connected with the meaning, function and physical care of public monuments which springs from research for the book Public Sculpture of North-East England (Usherwood, Beach and Morris, Liverpool University Press, 2000).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Focusing on the particular case of Victor Pasmore’s Apollo Pavilion at Peterlee New Town in Co. Durham (completed 1970), this article looks at the problem of how to deal with a piece of public art once vandalism, officially sanctioned modifications and changes to the setting have begun to take their toll. Noting that public art is really only effective when it sparks public engagement and debate, it takes the unusual approach of looking methodically at the way different groups, both local and non-local, have responded to a specific piece over two decades and concludes that there are circumstances when, paradoxically, a piece of public art may be best served by being destroyed. It draws on primary research The article was developed from a paper delivered at the symposium, Model Forms, Henry Moore Institute, Leeds, November 2002 which in turn was developed from an article, ‘Pasmore’s Pavilion at Peterlee’, Building Design, 9 November, 2001 It is part of Usherwood’s ongoing interest in issues connected with the meaning, function and physical care of public monuments which springs from research for the book Public Sculpture of North-East England (Usherwood, Beach and Morris, Liverpool University Press, 2000).

Key concepts: Sculpture, Pavilion, Art, Art history, Visual arts, Public art, Archaeology, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Victor Pasmore’s Peterlee Pavilion and the ‘publicness’ of public sculpture — Research Paper | ScholarLens