1998UCL Discovery (University College London)Requires access

Packing power into a tight space – how to marine engineer a trimaran.

AR Greig, Rwg Bucknall

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The benefits and constraints of the trimaran design are highlighted, and how these features impinge on the marine engineering design of the vessel is discussed. For the trimaran concept to be a success the marine engineering of the vessel must be considered from the outset of the design; the three long thin hulls of the vessel make it very sensitive to alterations in machinery fit. Trimarans are compared with monohulls: the overall length and beam of trimarans is greater, the extreme L/B ratio for the main hulls of the trimarans, 13.5 to 15.2 compared to the 5.1 to 8.3 for the monohulls, and the trimaran main hull beams are between 44% and 62% that of the monohulls. Distribution of the propulsion machinery in a trimaran can be split evenly between the side hulls, with nothing in the main hull, located in the main hull only, or divided between the main hull and the side hulls.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The benefits and constraints of the trimaran design are highlighted, and how these features impinge on the marine engineering design of the vessel is discussed. For the trimaran concept to be a success the marine engineering of the vessel must be considered from the outset of the design; the three long thin hulls of the vessel make it very sensitive to alterations in machinery fit. Trimarans are compared with monohulls: the overall length and beam of trimarans is greater, the extreme L/B ratio for the main hulls of the trimarans, 13.5 to 15.2 compared to the 5.1 to 8.3 for the monohulls, and the trimaran main hull beams are between 44% and 62% that of the monohulls. Distribution of the propulsion machinery in a trimaran can be split evenly between the side hulls, with nothing in the main hull, located in the main hull only, or divided between the main hull and the side hulls.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The benefits and constraints of the trimaran design are highlighted, and how these features impinge on the marine engineering design of the vessel is discussed. For the trimaran concept to be a success the marine engineering of the vessel must be considered from the outset of the design; the three long thin hulls of the vessel make it very sensitive to alterations in machinery fit. Trimarans are compared with monohulls: the overall length and beam of trimarans is greater, the extreme L/B ratio for the main hulls of the trimarans, 13.5 to 15.2 compared to the 5.1 to 8.3 for the monohulls, and the trimaran main hull beams are between 44% and 62% that of the monohulls. Distribution of the propulsion machinery in a trimaran can be split evenly between the side hulls, with nothing in the main hull, located in the main hull only, or divided between the main hull and the side hulls.

Key concepts: Hull, Engineering, Marine engineering, Naval architecture, Propulsion, Beam (structure), Power (physics), Shipbuilding

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Packing power into a tight space – how to marine engineer a trimaran. — Research Paper | ScholarLens