1996Health Marketing QuarterlyRequires access

College Student's Blood Donation Behavior:

Sarath A. Nonis, Charles W. Ford, Laddie Logan, Gail I. Hudson

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

A study was undertaken to empirically investigate whether the student market could be further segmented into blood donor and nondonor markets based on their demographic characteristics, perceived risks, and influence on non-monetary incentives. While significant differences were found between donors and nondonors based on their gender, blood type, student classification, and influence of incentives, no differences were found between the four (physical, psychological, social, or time) dimensions of perceived risk. Discussion focuses on strategies for blood collection agencies for student markets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study was undertaken to empirically investigate whether the student market could be further segmented into blood donor and nondonor markets based on their demographic characteristics, perceived risks, and influence on non-monetary incentives. While significant differences were found between donors and nondonors based on their gender, blood type, student classification, and influence of incentives, no differences were found between the four (physical, psychological, social, or time) dimensions of perceived risk. Discussion focuses on strategies for blood collection agencies for student markets.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study was undertaken to empirically investigate whether the student market could be further segmented into blood donor and nondonor markets based on their demographic characteristics, perceived risks, and influence on non-monetary incentives. While significant differences were found between donors and nondonors based on their gender, blood type, student classification, and influence of incentives, no differences were found between the four (physical, psychological, social, or time) dimensions of perceived risk. Discussion focuses on strategies for blood collection agencies for student markets.

Key concepts: Blood donor, Donation, Blood donations, Medicine, Family medicine, Immunology, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
College Student's Blood Donation Behavior: — Research Paper | ScholarLens