Passing Muster Evaluating Teacher Evaluation Systems
Steven Glazerman, Dan Goldhaber, Susanna Loeb, Stephen W. Raudenbush, Doug Staiger, Grover J. Whitehurst, Michelle Croft
Abstract
Steven Glazerman, Dan Goldhaber, Susanna Loeb, Stephen W. Raudenbush, Doug Staiger, Grover J. Whitehurst, Michelle Croft
Abstract
This report addresses the comparison of teacher evaluation systems and proposes ways to achieve a uniform standard for dispensing funds to districts to recognize exceptional teachers without imposing a uniform evaluation system on those districts. The report provides practical procedures to determine reliable local teacher evaluation systems. It also demonstrates how the reliability of the evaluation system determines the proportion of teachers who can be identified as exceptional.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This report addresses the comparison of teacher evaluation systems and proposes ways to achieve a uniform standard for dispensing funds to districts to recognize exceptional teachers without imposing a uniform evaluation system on those districts. The report provides practical procedures to determine reliable local teacher evaluation systems. It also demonstrates how the reliability of the evaluation system determines the proportion of teachers who can be identified as exceptional.
Key concepts: Reliability (semiconductor), Computer science, Evaluation methods, Mathematics education, Psychology, Reliability engineering, Engineering, Power (physics)