1993•White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Open access

A longitudinal study of literacy experiences, the role of parents, and children's literacy development

Jo Ann Weinberger

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the literacy experiences and attainment of 42 children aged \n3 to 7, who had attended preschool education in a city in the North of England. \nData were collected through parent interviews before nursery entry; literacy \nassessment at school entry, and at age seven; and by parent, teacher and child \ninterviews. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were employed. \n \n \nFour measures of literacy development at age seven were used: children's reading \nbook level, writing ability and standardised scores for reading and English at seven. \nFactors before school entry shown to be significant were: vocabulary scores, number \nof letters known, how well children wrote their name and a phrase, whether they \nlistened to stories at nursery, and how often they were read to at home. This was \ninfluenced by earlier home factors; by having access to books, being read to from \nstorybooks, and having books read in their entirety, the age parents started reading \nto them, how many nursery rhymes they knew, and parents pointing out \nenvironmental print. By seven, other significant factors were parents' knowledge \nabout school literacy, and how often children read to parents at home. Several \nfindings confirmed those of previous studies. Others were new: having a favourite \nbook before nursery, choosing to read books in nursery, access to home computers \nat seven, children storing literacy resources indiscriminately, parents reading more \nthan newspapers and magazines, and parents providing examples of day-to-day \nliteracy. Process variables appeared to exert greater effects on children's \nperformance than status variables, such as social class, mother's employment and \nqualifications, and relatives with literacy difficulties. \n \n \nHome literacy experiences for the majority of children were barely acknowledged \nin school, and home learning for children with problems was often unsupported by \nschool. For most children, homes provided rich, complex and powerful \nenvironments for literacy learning.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study investigated the literacy experiences and attainment of 42 children aged \n3 to 7, who had attended preschool education in a city in the North of England. \nData were collected through parent interviews before nursery entry; literacy \nassessment at school entry, and at age seven; and by parent, teacher and child \ninterviews. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were employed. \n \n \nFour measures of literacy development at age seven were used: children's reading \nbook level, writing ability and standardised scores for reading and English at seven. \nFactors before school entry shown to be significant were: vocabulary scores, number \nof letters known, how well children wrote their name and a phrase, whether they \nlistened to stories at nursery, and how often they were read to at home. This was \ninfluenced by earlier home factors; by having access to books, being read to from \nstorybooks, and having books read in their entirety, the age parents started reading \nto them, how many nursery rhymes they knew, and parents pointing out \nenvironmental print. By seven, other significant factors were parents' knowledge \nabout school literacy, and how often children read to parents at home. Several \nfindings confirmed those of previous studies. Others were new: having a favourite \nbook before nursery, choosing to read books in nursery, access to home computers \nat seven, children storing literacy resources indiscriminately, parents reading more \nthan newspapers and magazines, and parents providing examples of day-to-day \nliteracy. Process variables appeared to exert greater effects on children's \nperformance than status variables, such as social class, mother's employment and \nqualifications, and relatives with literacy difficulties. \n \n \nHome literacy experiences for the majority of children were barely acknowledged \nin school, and home learning for children with problems was often unsupported by \nschool. For most children, homes provided rich, complex and powerful \nenvironments for literacy learning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study investigated the literacy experiences and attainment of 42 children aged \n3 to 7, who had attended preschool education in a city in the North of England. \nData were collected through parent interviews before nursery entry; literacy \nassessment at school entry, and at age seven; and by parent, teacher and child \ninterviews. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were employed. \n \n \nFour measures of literacy development at age seven were used: children's reading \nbook level, writing ability and standardised scores for reading and English at seven. \nFactors before school entry shown to be significant were: vocabulary scores, number \nof letters known, how well children wrote their name and a phrase, whether they \nlistened to stories at nursery, and how often they were read to at home. This was \ninfluenced by earlier home factors; by having access to books, being read to from \nstorybooks, and having books read in their entirety, the age parents started reading \nto them, how many nursery rhymes they knew, and parents pointing out \nenvironmental print. By seven, other significant factors were parents' knowledge \nabout school literacy, and how often children read to parents at home. Several \nfindings confirmed those of previous studies. Others were new: having a favourite \nbook before nursery, choosing to read books in nursery, access to home computers \nat seven, children storing literacy resources indiscriminately, parents reading more \nthan newspapers and magazines, and parents providing examples of day-to-day \nliteracy. Process variables appeared to exert greater effects on children's \nperformance than status variables, such as social class, mother's employment and \nqualifications, and relatives with literacy difficulties. \n \n \nHome literacy experiences for the majority of children were barely acknowledged \nin school, and home learning for children with problems was often unsupported by \nschool. For most children, homes provided rich, complex and powerful \nenvironments for literacy learning.

Key concepts: Literacy, Reading (process), Psychology, Newspaper, Developmental psychology, Vocabulary, Pedagogy, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A longitudinal study of literacy experiences, the role of parents, and children's literacy development — Research Paper | ScholarLens