2012Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)Requires access

From Public Administration to Governance: science or ideology

Valery Louw

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Governments have been launching major public sector reforms. Traditional \npublic services are under pressure to transform and seem to be evolving \n– but into what? In the 1970s one could generally talk of public administration. \nIn the 1980s came the new move to the New Public Management (NPM), \nand some to Public Administration and Management. Recently some authors \nhave argued that there is a further shift from the NPM to governance. Although \npublic sector reforms are influenced by global precedents, local dynamics necessitates \nspecific responses from politicians, academics and public officials. This \nmuch is so in South Africa where evidence shows that theory played a secondary \nrole in the praxis of public administration. Instead, that praxis is dictated by political \nagendas and what is taught at traditional universities and the universities of \ntechnologies are uncritically supportive of these agendas. The aim of this article \nis to provide a content analysis of the ongoing shift from the concept of public \nadministration to governance by looking at the theories and approaches that have \ndominated the public administration arena from the traditional administration \napproach to the current governance approach. The article also seeks to investigate \nthe reasons for this shift.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Governments have been launching major public sector reforms. Traditional \npublic services are under pressure to transform and seem to be evolving \n– but into what? In the 1970s one could generally talk of public administration. \nIn the 1980s came the new move to the New Public Management (NPM), \nand some to Public Administration and Management. Recently some authors \nhave argued that there is a further shift from the NPM to governance. Although \npublic sector reforms are influenced by global precedents, local dynamics necessitates \nspecific responses from politicians, academics and public officials. This \nmuch is so in South Africa where evidence shows that theory played a secondary \nrole in the praxis of public administration. Instead, that praxis is dictated by political \nagendas and what is taught at traditional universities and the universities of \ntechnologies are uncritically supportive of these agendas. The aim of this article \nis to provide a content analysis of the ongoing shift from the concept of public \nadministration to governance by looking at the theories and approaches that have \ndominated the public administration arena from the traditional administration \napproach to the current governance approach. The article also seeks to investigate \nthe reasons for this shift.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Governments have been launching major public sector reforms. Traditional \npublic services are under pressure to transform and seem to be evolving \n– but into what? In the 1970s one could generally talk of public administration. \nIn the 1980s came the new move to the New Public Management (NPM), \nand some to Public Administration and Management. Recently some authors \nhave argued that there is a further shift from the NPM to governance. Although \npublic sector reforms are influenced by global precedents, local dynamics necessitates \nspecific responses from politicians, academics and public officials. This \nmuch is so in South Africa where evidence shows that theory played a secondary \nrole in the praxis of public administration. Instead, that praxis is dictated by political \nagendas and what is taught at traditional universities and the universities of \ntechnologies are uncritically supportive of these agendas. The aim of this article \nis to provide a content analysis of the ongoing shift from the concept of public \nadministration to governance by looking at the theories and approaches that have \ndominated the public administration arena from the traditional administration \napproach to the current governance approach. The article also seeks to investigate \nthe reasons for this shift.

Key concepts: Praxis, New public management, Public administration, Corporate governance, Administration (probate law), Public sector, Political science, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From Public Administration to Governance: science or ideology — Research Paper | ScholarLens