ScholarLens Back to search
2002•The William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (William & Mary)Open access

Ties in the Supreme Court of the United States

Edward A. Hartnett

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Id. at 263-69.Four Justices have recently urged the Court to revisit the Eighth Amendment question.In re Stanford, No. 01-10009 (Oct.21, 2002) (Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, JJ., dissenting from denial of stay of execution

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Id. at 263-69.Four Justices have recently urged the Court to revisit the Eighth Amendment question.In re Stanford, No. 01-10009 (Oct.21, 2002) (Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, JJ., dissenting from denial of stay of execution

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Id. at 263-69.Four Justices have recently urged the Court to revisit the Eighth Amendment question.In re Stanford, No. 01-10009 (Oct.21, 2002) (Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, JJ., dissenting from denial of stay of execution

Key concepts: Law, Supreme court, Imprisonment, Certiorari, Economic Justice, Confusion, Political science, Appeal

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ties in the Supreme Court of the United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens