1993USRA Houston Repository (Lunar and Planetary Institute)Requires access

Evaluating science return in space exploration initiative architectures

Nancy Ann Budden, P. D. Spudis

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Different SEI mission architectures are evaluated on the basis of three variables: access (to the planet's surface), capability (including number of crew, equipment, and supporting infrastructure)​, and time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Different SEI mission architectures are evaluated on the basis of three variables: access (to the planet's surface), capability (including number of crew, equipment, and supporting infrastructure)​, and time.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Different SEI mission architectures are evaluated on the basis of three variables: access (to the planet's surface), capability (including number of crew, equipment, and supporting infrastructure)​, and time.

Key concepts: Crew, Architecture, Mars Exploration Program, Implementation, Computer science, Space (punctuation), Space Science, Space exploration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating science return in space exploration initiative architectures — Research Paper | ScholarLens