1998•EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University)Open access

Courts' Evolving Roles in Daubert Decisions

Susan J. Becker

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-relaxed standard for the admission of expert scientific evidence than previously allowed under the popular Frye test.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-relaxed standard for the admission of expert scientific evidence than previously allowed under the popular Frye test.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Daubert, the Supreme Court interpreted Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to permit an arguably more-relaxed standard for the admission of expert scientific evidence than previously allowed under the popular Frye test.

Key concepts: Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Courts' Evolving Roles in Daubert Decisions — Research Paper | ScholarLens