1997•Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingRequires access

Human Factors Expert Testimony after Daubert (1993)

Gerald V. Barrett, Rafael Carneiro Ortiz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper reviewed Human Factors expert testimony after the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). Daubert (1993) set a new standard for Experts testifying in federal courts. Failure of a Human Factors expert to meet the Daubert standard will result in the exclusion of the expert's testimony. Court cases after Daubert (1993) were reviewed and principles were applied which resulted in acceptance or rejection of the Human Factors expert testimony. Considerations for Human Factors professionals testifying in court are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper reviewed Human Factors expert testimony after the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). Daubert (1993) set a new standard for Experts testifying in federal courts. Failure of a Human Factors expert to meet the Daubert standard will result in the exclusion of the expert's testimony. Court cases after Daubert (1993) were reviewed and principles were applied which resulted in acceptance or rejection of the Human Factors expert testimony. Considerations for Human Factors professionals testifying in court are discussed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper reviewed Human Factors expert testimony after the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). Daubert (1993) set a new standard for Experts testifying in federal courts. Failure of a Human Factors expert to meet the Daubert standard will result in the exclusion of the expert's testimony. Court cases after Daubert (1993) were reviewed and principles were applied which resulted in acceptance or rejection of the Human Factors expert testimony. Considerations for Human Factors professionals testifying in court are discussed.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Federal Rules of Evidence, Scientific evidence, Political science, Psychology, Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Human Factors Expert Testimony after Daubert (1993) — Research Paper | ScholarLens