1990Indian Journal of Animal NutritionOpen access

Effect of Supplementing Urea Molasses Mineral Block Lick to Untreated or Ammonia Treated Paddy Straw on Economics of Weight Gain and Age at Ma-Turity in Buffalo Calves

Manget Ram Garg, Ajai K. Tripathi, P. J. G. Kunju

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Twelve female Surti buffalo calves (12-14 m; 145-162 kg) were equally divided into two groups and fed on untreated paddy stravv ad lib + free access to urea molasses mineral block lick (UMMB; Gp. 1) and 2.5% (w/w) ammonia treated paddy straw ad lib + free access to UMMB (gp II). In addition all the animals were also offered 1 kg concentrate mixture + 2 kg green fodder. Total DM intake was not significantly different in group I and II. Straw intake (g/w0.7S kg) was significantly (P<0.01) higher in group II (94 ±2.04) than in group I (83 ± 2.87). UMMB intake (g/d) was significantly (P<0.05) higher in group I (246 ± 1732) than in group II (185 ± 18.22). Daily weight gain was not significantly different in both the groups. Animals in group I and II attained maturity at the age of 23 and 21m, respectively. Cost per kg gain was significantly (P<0.05) lower in group I (Rs. 9.49 ± 1.16) as compared to group II (Rs. 12.99 ± 0.88).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twelve female Surti buffalo calves (12-14 m; 145-162 kg) were equally divided into two groups and fed on untreated paddy stravv ad lib + free access to urea molasses mineral block lick (UMMB; Gp. 1) and 2.5% (w/w) ammonia treated paddy straw ad lib + free access to UMMB (gp II). In addition all the animals were also offered 1 kg concentrate mixture + 2 kg green fodder. Total DM intake was not significantly different in group I and II. Straw intake (g/w0.7S kg) was significantly (P<0.01) higher in group II (94 ±2.04) than in group I (83 ± 2.87). UMMB intake (g/d) was significantly (P<0.05) higher in group I (246 ± 1732) than in group II (185 ± 18.22). Daily weight gain was not significantly different in both the groups. Animals in group I and II attained maturity at the age of 23 and 21m, respectively. Cost per kg gain was significantly (P<0.05) lower in group I (Rs. 9.49 ± 1.16) as compared to group II (Rs. 12.99 ± 0.88).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twelve female Surti buffalo calves (12-14 m; 145-162 kg) were equally divided into two groups and fed on untreated paddy stravv ad lib + free access to urea molasses mineral block lick (UMMB; Gp. 1) and 2.5% (w/w) ammonia treated paddy straw ad lib + free access to UMMB (gp II). In addition all the animals were also offered 1 kg concentrate mixture + 2 kg green fodder. Total DM intake was not significantly different in group I and II. Straw intake (g/w0.7S kg) was significantly (P<0.01) higher in group II (94 ±2.04) than in group I (83 ± 2.87). UMMB intake (g/d) was significantly (P<0.05) higher in group I (246 ± 1732) than in group II (185 ± 18.22). Daily weight gain was not significantly different in both the groups. Animals in group I and II attained maturity at the age of 23 and 21m, respectively. Cost per kg gain was significantly (P<0.05) lower in group I (Rs. 9.49 ± 1.16) as compared to group II (Rs. 12.99 ± 0.88).

Key concepts: Straw, Animal science, Urea, Ruminant, Fodder, Veterinary medicine, Weight gain, Body weight

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Supplementing Urea Molasses Mineral Block Lick to Untreated or Ammonia Treated Paddy Straw on Economics of Weight Gain and Age at Ma-Turity in Buffalo Calves — Research Paper | ScholarLens