1979•Unpublished venueRequires access

Sorghum/chickpea intercropping trial at Morogoro, Tanzania.

Md. Shah Newaz Chowdhury, R.N. Misangu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) was intercropped with uninoculated or inoculated chickpea (Cicer arietinum) at varied soil fertility levels in a field experiment using a randomized block design. Chickpea was inoculated with a commercial inoculant (Nitrogerm-chickpea) under three levels of soil fertility: (a) no fertilizer (control), (b) 20 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate, and (c) 20 kg N/ha plus 100 kg P/ha as ammonium sulfate and triple superphosphate, respectively. Nodulation, dry matter, and N content of chickpea were examined at various stages of growth. Results indicated the absence of indigenous rhizobia for chickpea. Inoculation significantly increased dry matter and N content of chickpea, but failed to cause a significant grain yield increase. Intercropping greatly decreased the dry matter content and grain yield of chickpea but had no effect on yield of sorghum

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) was intercropped with uninoculated or inoculated chickpea (Cicer arietinum) at varied soil fertility levels in a field experiment using a randomized block design. Chickpea was inoculated with a commercial inoculant (Nitrogerm-chickpea) under three levels of soil fertility: (a) no fertilizer (control), (b) 20 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate, and (c) 20 kg N/ha plus 100 kg P/ha as ammonium sulfate and triple superphosphate, respectively. Nodulation, dry matter, and N content of chickpea were examined at various stages of growth. Results indicated the absence of indigenous rhizobia for chickpea. Inoculation significantly increased dry matter and N content of chickpea, but failed to cause a significant grain yield increase. Intercropping greatly decreased the dry matter content and grain yield of chickpea but had no effect on yield of sorghum

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) was intercropped with uninoculated or inoculated chickpea (Cicer arietinum) at varied soil fertility levels in a field experiment using a randomized block design. Chickpea was inoculated with a commercial inoculant (Nitrogerm-chickpea) under three levels of soil fertility: (a) no fertilizer (control), (b) 20 kg N/ha as ammonium sulfate, and (c) 20 kg N/ha plus 100 kg P/ha as ammonium sulfate and triple superphosphate, respectively. Nodulation, dry matter, and N content of chickpea were examined at various stages of growth. Results indicated the absence of indigenous rhizobia for chickpea. Inoculation significantly increased dry matter and N content of chickpea, but failed to cause a significant grain yield increase. Intercropping greatly decreased the dry matter content and grain yield of chickpea but had no effect on yield of sorghum

Key concepts: Sorghum, Dry matter, Agronomy, Intercropping, Randomized block design, Microbial inoculant, Biology, Soil fertility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sorghum/chickpea intercropping trial at Morogoro, Tanzania. — Research Paper | ScholarLens