The Constant Shape Parameter Assumption in Weibull Regression
Georgia Mueller, Steven E. Rigdon
Abstract
Georgia Mueller, Steven E. Rigdon
Abstract
The usual assumption in Weibull regression is that the scale parameter is a function of the predictor variables, and the shape parameter is constant. We consider the problem of estimating parameters in the presence of a nonconstant shape parameter and the effect of assuming a constant shape parameter when it really is not constant. We consider both classical and Bayesian methods of estimation. The misspecification of a constant shape parameter can lead to a loss of power for tests regarding the slope parameters. We find that prediction intervals can be inaccurate when the shape parameter is incorrectly assumed to be constant.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The usual assumption in Weibull regression is that the scale parameter is a function of the predictor variables, and the shape parameter is constant. We consider the problem of estimating parameters in the presence of a nonconstant shape parameter and the effect of assuming a constant shape parameter when it really is not constant. We consider both classical and Bayesian methods of estimation. The misspecification of a constant shape parameter can lead to a loss of power for tests regarding the slope parameters. We find that prediction intervals can be inaccurate when the shape parameter is incorrectly assumed to be constant.
Key concepts: Shape parameter, Scale parameter, Constant (computer programming), Weibull distribution, Mathematics, Estimation theory, Statistics, Function (biology)