2014Ceramic engineering and science proceedingsRequires access

Testing Method for Ceramic Armor and Bare Ceramic Tiles

E.P. Carton, G.H.J.J. Roebroeks

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Over the years research on armor ceramics have demonstrated that the projectile−ceramic tile interaction process consists of several stages. The first stage, which starts at the arrival of the nose of the projectile on the strike face of the ceramic tile, is called the dwell phase as the projectile nose does not penetrate the tile but dwells on its surface. The tail of the projectile still has a constant (impact) velocity, whereas its nose is stopped. This leads to dynamic compressive loading of both the ceramic tile and the projectile. When unsupported, the projectile deforms and, depending on its failure strain, starts to fracture. Several test methods for ceramic materials and ceramic-based armor have been developed and used. In this chapter, the depth-of-penetration test method is analyzed. The alternative test method presented in the chapter is a step in that direction as the ceramic tiles can be tested in bare state as well as with a backing. The variation between identical shots is on the order of 10%, enabling relatively small differences between ceramic samples to be quantified. Furthermore, the dissipated kinetic energy of the projectile is measured and an estimation of the dwell time is obtained. The current view on projectile ceramic interaction is also discussed followed by an explanation of the alternative test method proposed in this work. Finally, some test results using the alternative test method are provided and conclusions are drawn.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the years research on armor ceramics have demonstrated that the projectile−ceramic tile interaction process consists of several stages. The first stage, which starts at the arrival of the nose of the projectile on the strike face of the ceramic tile, is called the dwell phase as the projectile nose does not penetrate the tile but dwells on its surface. The tail of the projectile still has a constant (impact) velocity, whereas its nose is stopped. This leads to dynamic compressive loading of both the ceramic tile and the projectile. When unsupported, the projectile deforms and, depending on its failure strain, starts to fracture. Several test methods for ceramic materials and ceramic-based armor have been developed and used. In this chapter, the depth-of-penetration test method is analyzed. The alternative test method presented in the chapter is a step in that direction as the ceramic tiles can be tested in bare state as well as with a backing. The variation between identical shots is on the order of 10%, enabling relatively small differences between ceramic samples to be quantified. Furthermore, the dissipated kinetic energy of the projectile is measured and an estimation of the dwell time is obtained. The current view on projectile ceramic interaction is also discussed followed by an explanation of the alternative test method proposed in this work. Finally, some test results using the alternative test method are provided and conclusions are drawn.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the years research on armor ceramics have demonstrated that the projectile−ceramic tile interaction process consists of several stages. The first stage, which starts at the arrival of the nose of the projectile on the strike face of the ceramic tile, is called the dwell phase as the projectile nose does not penetrate the tile but dwells on its surface. The tail of the projectile still has a constant (impact) velocity, whereas its nose is stopped. This leads to dynamic compressive loading of both the ceramic tile and the projectile. When unsupported, the projectile deforms and, depending on its failure strain, starts to fracture. Several test methods for ceramic materials and ceramic-based armor have been developed and used. In this chapter, the depth-of-penetration test method is analyzed. The alternative test method presented in the chapter is a step in that direction as the ceramic tiles can be tested in bare state as well as with a backing. The variation between identical shots is on the order of 10%, enabling relatively small differences between ceramic samples to be quantified. Furthermore, the dissipated kinetic energy of the projectile is measured and an estimation of the dwell time is obtained. The current view on projectile ceramic interaction is also discussed followed by an explanation of the alternative test method proposed in this work. Finally, some test results using the alternative test method are provided and conclusions are drawn.

Key concepts: Projectile, Tile, Ceramic, Materials science, Armour, Composite material, Ballistics, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Testing Method for Ceramic Armor and Bare Ceramic Tiles — Research Paper | ScholarLens