2005•FLASH - Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship & History (Fordham University)Open access

The Forgotten Public Policies Behind the Family and Medical Leave Act: Burden of Proof Structures Placing Unnecessary Burdens on Employees' Statutory Entitlement

Lisa B. Feinstein

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Since Congress passed the FMLA in 1993, there has been confusion in the courts on how to address an employee's claim that he was punished for exercising his FMLA rights.Different approaches to the FMLA and work-family issues have developed in recent years.Part I.A addresses the policies behind the FMLA and Congress's goals in providing minimum leave and job security.Part I.B discusses the various approaches the federal courts use to address FMLA claims.Part I.C examines how the FMLA and work-family leave issues are addressed both as common law tort claims and in arbitration.A. Why Congress Passed the FMLA: The Policies Behind the Act Congress passed the FMLA in an attempt to address the difficulty workers encountered when trying to balance workplace and family needs.27 The FMLA provides job security to employees who must be 2005

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since Congress passed the FMLA in 1993, there has been confusion in the courts on how to address an employee's claim that he was punished for exercising his FMLA rights.Different approaches to the FMLA and work-family issues have developed in recent years.Part I.A addresses the policies behind the FMLA and Congress's goals in providing minimum leave and job security.Part I.B discusses the various approaches the federal courts use to address FMLA claims.Part I.C examines how the FMLA and work-family leave issues are addressed both as common law tort claims and in arbitration.A. Why Congress Passed the FMLA: The Policies Behind the Act Congress passed the FMLA in an attempt to address the difficulty workers encountered when trying to balance workplace and family needs.27 The FMLA provides job security to employees who must be 2005

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since Congress passed the FMLA in 1993, there has been confusion in the courts on how to address an employee's claim that he was punished for exercising his FMLA rights.Different approaches to the FMLA and work-family issues have developed in recent years.Part I.A addresses the policies behind the FMLA and Congress's goals in providing minimum leave and job security.Part I.B discusses the various approaches the federal courts use to address FMLA claims.Part I.C examines how the FMLA and work-family leave issues are addressed both as common law tort claims and in arbitration.A. Why Congress Passed the FMLA: The Policies Behind the Act Congress passed the FMLA in an attempt to address the difficulty workers encountered when trying to balance workplace and family needs.27 The FMLA provides job security to employees who must be 2005

Key concepts: Entitlement (fair division), Statutory law, Burden of proof, Business, Law, Law and economics, Economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Forgotten Public Policies Behind the Family and Medical Leave Act: Burden of Proof Structures Placing Unnecessary Burdens on Employees' Statutory Entitlement — Research Paper | ScholarLens