2013Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University)Requires access

Field analysis in cultural sociology: some critical reflections

Mike Savage, Elizabeth Silva

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The idea of field analysis has been championed as an alternative to ‘variable based’ accounts of social life, and offers the potential for cross-fertilisation with complexity theory and forms of ‘descriptive’ research. Yet, the Bourdieusian roots of field analysis pose challenges as well as advantages, given the widespread critique of reductionist elements in Bourdieu’s thinking. This introduction lays out how Bourdieu conceives field analysis and some of the ambivalences this might give rise to. \nThe papers in this special issue explore through worked examples how field analysis might be radicalised and made more dynamic. We focus on three main issues: (1) understanding emerging field dynamics which challenge the influential model that Bourdieu uses in Distinction, (2) showing its potential for comparative analysis and (3) recognising the role of materiality in cultural relations. \nThese papers therefore allow for varied engagements with the theoretical underpinnings of the classical formulations of field theory via empirical analyses of both ‘established’ and ‘new’ fields to explore the trajectories of possible developments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The idea of field analysis has been championed as an alternative to ‘variable based’ accounts of social life, and offers the potential for cross-fertilisation with complexity theory and forms of ‘descriptive’ research. Yet, the Bourdieusian roots of field analysis pose challenges as well as advantages, given the widespread critique of reductionist elements in Bourdieu’s thinking. This introduction lays out how Bourdieu conceives field analysis and some of the ambivalences this might give rise to. \nThe papers in this special issue explore through worked examples how field analysis might be radicalised and made more dynamic. We focus on three main issues: (1) understanding emerging field dynamics which challenge the influential model that Bourdieu uses in Distinction, (2) showing its potential for comparative analysis and (3) recognising the role of materiality in cultural relations. \nThese papers therefore allow for varied engagements with the theoretical underpinnings of the classical formulations of field theory via empirical analyses of both ‘established’ and ‘new’ fields to explore the trajectories of possible developments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The idea of field analysis has been championed as an alternative to ‘variable based’ accounts of social life, and offers the potential for cross-fertilisation with complexity theory and forms of ‘descriptive’ research. Yet, the Bourdieusian roots of field analysis pose challenges as well as advantages, given the widespread critique of reductionist elements in Bourdieu’s thinking. This introduction lays out how Bourdieu conceives field analysis and some of the ambivalences this might give rise to. \nThe papers in this special issue explore through worked examples how field analysis might be radicalised and made more dynamic. We focus on three main issues: (1) understanding emerging field dynamics which challenge the influential model that Bourdieu uses in Distinction, (2) showing its potential for comparative analysis and (3) recognising the role of materiality in cultural relations. \nThese papers therefore allow for varied engagements with the theoretical underpinnings of the classical formulations of field theory via empirical analyses of both ‘established’ and ‘new’ fields to explore the trajectories of possible developments.

Key concepts: Epistemology, Field (mathematics), Sociology, Reductionism, Habitus, Focus (optics), Materiality (auditing), Social theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field analysis in cultural sociology: some critical reflections — Research Paper | ScholarLens