ScholarLens Back to search
1981•Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University)Open access

The Case for Quick Relief: Use of Section 10(j) of the Labor-Management Relations Act in Discriminatory Discharge Cases

Randal L. Gainer

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This affirmative grant of jurisdiction was necessary since in 1932 Congress, by means of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, id.§ § 101-115, had for all practical purposes, eliminated the use of labor injunctions by federal courts.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This affirmative grant of jurisdiction was necessary since in 1932 Congress, by means of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, id.§ § 101-115, had for all practical purposes, eliminated the use of labor injunctions by federal courts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This affirmative grant of jurisdiction was necessary since in 1932 Congress, by means of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, id.§ § 101-115, had for all practical purposes, eliminated the use of labor injunctions by federal courts.

Key concepts: Section (typography), Law and economics, Business, Law, Political science, Economics, Advertising

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Case for Quick Relief: Use of Section 10(j) of the Labor-Management Relations Act in Discriminatory Discharge Cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens