1982•Unpublished venueRequires access

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTIVE CONSERVATION IN URBAN TRANSPORTATION--FINAL REPORT

Sarah Labelle, D O Moses

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Two strategies for the productive conservation of energy in urban transportation were compared to a reference situation in three typical cities in two plausible socio-economic scenarios; the reference case assumed as extension of transportation policies in place in 1980. Travel patterns, revenues and costs, and vehicle purchases were forecast; the resulting impacts on the physical environment, use of energy and materials, the economy, and health and safety were examined. The Group Travel Strategy, which included substantial additions to transit service, transit fare reductions, and gasoline and parking tax increases, yielded slightly higher energy savings than did the Individual Travel Strategy. The latter strategy raised average new car fuel economy steadily until the year 2000 and changed nothing else relative to the In-Place Policy. By 2000, assuming steady fuel price increases, the projected savings in total energy use under both strategies exceeded the savings projected under the In-Place Policy, where total energy use declined 16 to 34% from 1980 levels. The nature of the energy used for urban transportation changed significantly by 2000. In all situations, indirect energy use rose to about 40% of the total from the 1980 value of 24%. The environmental impacts varied by strategy, with Group Travelmore » Strategy impacts in general more benign.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two strategies for the productive conservation of energy in urban transportation were compared to a reference situation in three typical cities in two plausible socio-economic scenarios; the reference case assumed as extension of transportation policies in place in 1980. Travel patterns, revenues and costs, and vehicle purchases were forecast; the resulting impacts on the physical environment, use of energy and materials, the economy, and health and safety were examined. The Group Travel Strategy, which included substantial additions to transit service, transit fare reductions, and gasoline and parking tax increases, yielded slightly higher energy savings than did the Individual Travel Strategy. The latter strategy raised average new car fuel economy steadily until the year 2000 and changed nothing else relative to the In-Place Policy. By 2000, assuming steady fuel price increases, the projected savings in total energy use under both strategies exceeded the savings projected under the In-Place Policy, where total energy use declined 16 to 34% from 1980 levels. The nature of the energy used for urban transportation changed significantly by 2000. In all situations, indirect energy use rose to about 40% of the total from the 1980 value of 24%. The environmental impacts varied by strategy, with Group Travelmore » Strategy impacts in general more benign.« less

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two strategies for the productive conservation of energy in urban transportation were compared to a reference situation in three typical cities in two plausible socio-economic scenarios; the reference case assumed as extension of transportation policies in place in 1980. Travel patterns, revenues and costs, and vehicle purchases were forecast; the resulting impacts on the physical environment, use of energy and materials, the economy, and health and safety were examined. The Group Travel Strategy, which included substantial additions to transit service, transit fare reductions, and gasoline and parking tax increases, yielded slightly higher energy savings than did the Individual Travel Strategy. The latter strategy raised average new car fuel economy steadily until the year 2000 and changed nothing else relative to the In-Place Policy. By 2000, assuming steady fuel price increases, the projected savings in total energy use under both strategies exceeded the savings projected under the In-Place Policy, where total energy use declined 16 to 34% from 1980 levels. The nature of the energy used for urban transportation changed significantly by 2000. In all situations, indirect energy use rose to about 40% of the total from the 1980 value of 24%. The environmental impacts varied by strategy, with Group Travelmore » Strategy impacts in general more benign.« less

Key concepts: Revenue, Fuel tax, Fuel efficiency, Energy conservation, Economics, Transport engineering, Business, Agricultural economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTIVE CONSERVATION IN URBAN TRANSPORTATION--FINAL REPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens