A comparative study of backlash compensation methods
Tomislav Jukic, Nedjeljko Perić
Abstract
Tomislav Jukic, Nedjeljko Perić
Abstract
This paper describes three different approaches to compensation of backlash influence in a position-controlled system. The influence of backlash in a cascade structured position controller (method 1) with inner torque control loop is compensated by utilizing a fast linear torque controller, at the expense of having to measure the torque on shaft. Defining the model of backlash (method 2) allows for compensation of backlash influence by superposition of compensation signal. However, this method is more sensitive to measurement noise. Variable structure controller (method 3) (one for linear, and the other for nonlinear regime) proved well, with constraints on input signal. These methods were chosen because they were judged most appropriate with respect to constructional and computational constraints in the controlled system. Excellent system behaviors had been experimentally verified on a laboratory model, when proposed control concepts were utilized.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper describes three different approaches to compensation of backlash influence in a position-controlled system. The influence of backlash in a cascade structured position controller (method 1) with inner torque control loop is compensated by utilizing a fast linear torque controller, at the expense of having to measure the torque on shaft. Defining the model of backlash (method 2) allows for compensation of backlash influence by superposition of compensation signal. However, this method is more sensitive to measurement noise. Variable structure controller (method 3) (one for linear, and the other for nonlinear regime) proved well, with constraints on input signal. These methods were chosen because they were judged most appropriate with respect to constructional and computational constraints in the controlled system. Excellent system behaviors had been experimentally verified on a laboratory model, when proposed control concepts were utilized.
Key concepts: Backlash, Control theory (sociology), Torque, Compensation (psychology), Superposition principle, Controller (irrigation), Position (finance), Control engineering