2003Unpublished venueRequires access

A comparative study of backlash compensation methods

Tomislav Jukic, Nedjeljko Perić

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This paper describes three different approaches to compensation of backlash influence in a position-controlled system. The influence of backlash in a cascade structured position controller (method 1) with inner torque control loop is compensated by utilizing a fast linear torque controller, at the expense of having to measure the torque on shaft. Defining the model of backlash (method 2) allows for compensation of backlash influence by superposition of compensation signal. However, this method is more sensitive to measurement noise. Variable structure controller (method 3) (one for linear, and the other for nonlinear regime) proved well, with constraints on input signal. These methods were chosen because they were judged most appropriate with respect to constructional and computational constraints in the controlled system. Excellent system behaviors had been experimentally verified on a laboratory model, when proposed control concepts were utilized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes three different approaches to compensation of backlash influence in a position-controlled system. The influence of backlash in a cascade structured position controller (method 1) with inner torque control loop is compensated by utilizing a fast linear torque controller, at the expense of having to measure the torque on shaft. Defining the model of backlash (method 2) allows for compensation of backlash influence by superposition of compensation signal. However, this method is more sensitive to measurement noise. Variable structure controller (method 3) (one for linear, and the other for nonlinear regime) proved well, with constraints on input signal. These methods were chosen because they were judged most appropriate with respect to constructional and computational constraints in the controlled system. Excellent system behaviors had been experimentally verified on a laboratory model, when proposed control concepts were utilized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes three different approaches to compensation of backlash influence in a position-controlled system. The influence of backlash in a cascade structured position controller (method 1) with inner torque control loop is compensated by utilizing a fast linear torque controller, at the expense of having to measure the torque on shaft. Defining the model of backlash (method 2) allows for compensation of backlash influence by superposition of compensation signal. However, this method is more sensitive to measurement noise. Variable structure controller (method 3) (one for linear, and the other for nonlinear regime) proved well, with constraints on input signal. These methods were chosen because they were judged most appropriate with respect to constructional and computational constraints in the controlled system. Excellent system behaviors had been experimentally verified on a laboratory model, when proposed control concepts were utilized.

Key concepts: Backlash, Control theory (sociology), Torque, Compensation (psychology), Superposition principle, Controller (irrigation), Position (finance), Control engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of backlash compensation methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens