1983Coal Technol. (Houston); (United States)Requires access

Modular coal-fired FBC cogeneration

C. B. Thunem, F.M. Shelor, Norm Smith

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The general conception among energy users is that coal-fired cogeneration in the 25,000 to 80,000 pph range is not financially attractive. This article describes an approach developed to allow the use of coal or waste as a fuel in this market. The design approach focuses on modular design, multifuel capability and inherent emissions control. While these three areas are all important, the prime considerations from an industrial viewpoint are economic considerations and risk assessments. The use of coal as a fuel, and especially of cogeneration, requires a larger capital investment, however this article shows that coal-fired cogeneration will actually reduce the overall energy cost for most plants presently burning gas. In addition to steam generation with gas, other thermal cycles are available, the two most common being gas-fired steam cogeneration and gas-fired gas turbine cogeneration. In conclusion it is pointed out that FBC coal-fired cogeneration can be cost-effective in the 25,000 to 80,000 pph range; that there is little risk associated with selection of FBC coal firing as opposed to conventional gas firing although a careful analysis during the preliminary design is necessary for selection of the best option, and that selection of financing alternatives will dramatically affect the IRRmore » and discounted cash flows.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The general conception among energy users is that coal-fired cogeneration in the 25,000 to 80,000 pph range is not financially attractive. This article describes an approach developed to allow the use of coal or waste as a fuel in this market. The design approach focuses on modular design, multifuel capability and inherent emissions control. While these three areas are all important, the prime considerations from an industrial viewpoint are economic considerations and risk assessments. The use of coal as a fuel, and especially of cogeneration, requires a larger capital investment, however this article shows that coal-fired cogeneration will actually reduce the overall energy cost for most plants presently burning gas. In addition to steam generation with gas, other thermal cycles are available, the two most common being gas-fired steam cogeneration and gas-fired gas turbine cogeneration. In conclusion it is pointed out that FBC coal-fired cogeneration can be cost-effective in the 25,000 to 80,000 pph range; that there is little risk associated with selection of FBC coal firing as opposed to conventional gas firing although a careful analysis during the preliminary design is necessary for selection of the best option, and that selection of financing alternatives will dramatically affect the IRRmore » and discounted cash flows.« less

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The general conception among energy users is that coal-fired cogeneration in the 25,000 to 80,000 pph range is not financially attractive. This article describes an approach developed to allow the use of coal or waste as a fuel in this market. The design approach focuses on modular design, multifuel capability and inherent emissions control. While these three areas are all important, the prime considerations from an industrial viewpoint are economic considerations and risk assessments. The use of coal as a fuel, and especially of cogeneration, requires a larger capital investment, however this article shows that coal-fired cogeneration will actually reduce the overall energy cost for most plants presently burning gas. In addition to steam generation with gas, other thermal cycles are available, the two most common being gas-fired steam cogeneration and gas-fired gas turbine cogeneration. In conclusion it is pointed out that FBC coal-fired cogeneration can be cost-effective in the 25,000 to 80,000 pph range; that there is little risk associated with selection of FBC coal firing as opposed to conventional gas firing although a careful analysis during the preliminary design is necessary for selection of the best option, and that selection of financing alternatives will dramatically affect the IRRmore » and discounted cash flows.« less

Key concepts: Cogeneration, Waste management, Coal, Engineering, Discounted cash flow, Thermal power station, Electricity generation, Environmental economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modular coal-fired FBC cogeneration — Research Paper | ScholarLens