1995PubMedOpen access

Clinical evaluation of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

N. Nagai, Kiyoto Takehara, Takayuki Murakami, Koso Ohama, S Miyaoka, T. Fujii, Sunao Matsubayashi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The clinical evaluation of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 38 patients treated with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer stage III was investigated among 3 groups. G-CSF was not given in group A (19 courses), was administered from day 5 of chemotherapy in group B (53 courses), and was given when the WBC count decreased to below 2,000/mm3 in group C (29 courses). The time to nadir was significantly shorter in group B compared with groups A and C and revealed 10 days for the WBC count and 11 days for the neutrophil count (p <0.01), with mean nadir values of 2,896/mm3 and 982/mm3 respectively, and so the count of WBC and neutrophil have been kept during the course. The effect of G-CSF was not modified by age, body weight or the number of chemotherapy courses in groups B and C. These results demonstrate that early treatment with G-CSF may allow increased intensity of chemotherapy by using greater doses or by shortening of the interval between cycles.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The clinical evaluation of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 38 patients treated with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer stage III was investigated among 3 groups. G-CSF was not given in group A (19 courses), was administered from day 5 of chemotherapy in group B (53 courses), and was given when the WBC count decreased to below 2,000/mm3 in group C (29 courses). The time to nadir was significantly shorter in group B compared with groups A and C and revealed 10 days for the WBC count and 11 days for the neutrophil count (p <0.01), with mean nadir values of 2,896/mm3 and 982/mm3 respectively, and so the count of WBC and neutrophil have been kept during the course. The effect of G-CSF was not modified by age, body weight or the number of chemotherapy courses in groups B and C. These results demonstrate that early treatment with G-CSF may allow increased intensity of chemotherapy by using greater doses or by shortening of the interval between cycles.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The clinical evaluation of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 38 patients treated with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer stage III was investigated among 3 groups. G-CSF was not given in group A (19 courses), was administered from day 5 of chemotherapy in group B (53 courses), and was given when the WBC count decreased to below 2,000/mm3 in group C (29 courses). The time to nadir was significantly shorter in group B compared with groups A and C and revealed 10 days for the WBC count and 11 days for the neutrophil count (p <0.01), with mean nadir values of 2,896/mm3 and 982/mm3 respectively, and so the count of WBC and neutrophil have been kept during the course. The effect of G-CSF was not modified by age, body weight or the number of chemotherapy courses in groups B and C. These results demonstrate that early treatment with G-CSF may allow increased intensity of chemotherapy by using greater doses or by shortening of the interval between cycles.

Key concepts: Medicine, Chemotherapy, Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, Absolute neutrophil count, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Ovarian cancer, Group B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. — Research Paper | ScholarLens