2010RAND Corporation eBooksRequires access

What Can We Learn from the Implementation of No Child Left Behind?

Brian M. Stecher, Georges Vernez, Paul Steinberg

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Studies suggest that the No Child Left Behind Act's goal of 100 percent of U.S. students proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014 will not be met. Broad implementation guidelines have resulted in a different accountability system in every state.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Studies suggest that the No Child Left Behind Act's goal of 100 percent of U.S. students proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014 will not be met. Broad implementation guidelines have resulted in a different accountability system in every state.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Studies suggest that the No Child Left Behind Act's goal of 100 percent of U.S. students proficient in reading and mathematics by 2014 will not be met. Broad implementation guidelines have resulted in a different accountability system in every state.

Key concepts: No child left behind, Accountability, Left behind, Reading (process), State (computer science), Mathematics education, Psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What Can We Learn from the Implementation of No Child Left Behind? — Research Paper | ScholarLens