2012•Unpublished venueRequires access

Bacterial biocontrol strains that reduce Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings

Oana-Alina Sicuia, Florica CONSTANTINESCU, Sorina Dinu

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

To suppress the Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings we used several antagonistic bacterial strains of Bacillus subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and Mycobacterium alvei. These bacterial strains were previously selected for their in vitro ability to control Rhizoctonia solani and were formulated as alginate pellets. The experiment was performed in a growth chamber on tomato cultivar HEINZ 2274. To compare our results with a standardized fungicide we used a chemical treatment with thiophanate-methil, together with other two experimental controls, a negative one, without treatment and a positive one, uninfected. Results showed that the selected strains of B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and Mycobacterium alvei expressed a biocontrol activity with 37,5 % efficacy in reducing the Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings, equivalent to the chemical treatment. However, the 98a strain of Bacillus subtilis expressed 50 % efficacy in Rhizoctonia biocontrol.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To suppress the Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings we used several antagonistic bacterial strains of Bacillus subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and Mycobacterium alvei. These bacterial strains were previously selected for their in vitro ability to control Rhizoctonia solani and were formulated as alginate pellets. The experiment was performed in a growth chamber on tomato cultivar HEINZ 2274. To compare our results with a standardized fungicide we used a chemical treatment with thiophanate-methil, together with other two experimental controls, a negative one, without treatment and a positive one, uninfected. Results showed that the selected strains of B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and Mycobacterium alvei expressed a biocontrol activity with 37,5 % efficacy in reducing the Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings, equivalent to the chemical treatment. However, the 98a strain of Bacillus subtilis expressed 50 % efficacy in Rhizoctonia biocontrol.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To suppress the Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings we used several antagonistic bacterial strains of Bacillus subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and Mycobacterium alvei. These bacterial strains were previously selected for their in vitro ability to control Rhizoctonia solani and were formulated as alginate pellets. The experiment was performed in a growth chamber on tomato cultivar HEINZ 2274. To compare our results with a standardized fungicide we used a chemical treatment with thiophanate-methil, together with other two experimental controls, a negative one, without treatment and a positive one, uninfected. Results showed that the selected strains of B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus and Mycobacterium alvei expressed a biocontrol activity with 37,5 % efficacy in reducing the Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings, equivalent to the chemical treatment. However, the 98a strain of Bacillus subtilis expressed 50 % efficacy in Rhizoctonia biocontrol.

Key concepts: Bacillus pumilus, Rhizoctonia solani, Rhizoctonia, Damping off, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus subtilis, Biological pest control, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bacterial biocontrol strains that reduce Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato seedlings — Research Paper | ScholarLens