1992Lincoln (University of Nebraska)Open access

Changes in Extension Educators' Perceptions of Job Dimensions and Job satisfaction Following Organizational Restructuring

John W. Furgason

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The literature provides ample evidence that state Extension programs across the country are introducing new or modified program development approaches and reorganized work units as they attempt to remain responsive to the public's educational needs. Implementation of such innovations, in many instances, represents change in Extension agent roles and responsibilities which could be characterized as a redesign of Extension work. Research on the effects of job redesign has consistently found evidence that workers' perceptions of certain core dimensions or characteristics of their jobs influence their satisfaction with that job. Given the changing organizational climate within Extension and the findings of job redesign research, the present inquiry explored whether the introduction of organizational innovations changed Extension agent job perceptions and job satisfaction. Data from prior research with Nebraska Extension agents established a baseline of perceptions about the level of skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, feedback, personal satisfaction, and context satisfaction present in the job of agent. These observations, obtained before program development and work unit changes were implemented, were contrasted with agents' current perceptions of the same factors following introduction of organizational changes. The study findings suggested that agents (n=103) saw the job dimensions as unchanged and experienced no change in personal satisfaction. Further, new agents (n=33) who had joined the organization after implementation of the innovations did not appear to perceive the job dimensions and personal satisfaction differently from their experienced colleagues. Satisfaction with compensation and supervision improved, while satisfaction with co-worker relations declined, among those agents experiencing the work modifications. In addition, these agents were more satisfied with job security, compensation, and supervision than were their newer colleagues. It was concluded that, over the five-year period, implementation of issues-based programming and clustered work units had not altered Extension agent perceptions of core job dimensions or levels of job satisfaction, but may have affected some aspects of satisfaction with the work context. Advisor: John M. Dirkx

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The literature provides ample evidence that state Extension programs across the country are introducing new or modified program development approaches and reorganized work units as they attempt to remain responsive to the public's educational needs. Implementation of such innovations, in many instances, represents change in Extension agent roles and responsibilities which could be characterized as a redesign of Extension work. Research on the effects of job redesign has consistently found evidence that workers' perceptions of certain core dimensions or characteristics of their jobs influence their satisfaction with that job. Given the changing organizational climate within Extension and the findings of job redesign research, the present inquiry explored whether the introduction of organizational innovations changed Extension agent job perceptions and job satisfaction. Data from prior research with Nebraska Extension agents established a baseline of perceptions about the level of skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, feedback, personal satisfaction, and context satisfaction present in the job of agent. These observations, obtained before program development and work unit changes were implemented, were contrasted with agents' current perceptions of the same factors following introduction of organizational changes. The study findings suggested that agents (n=103) saw the job dimensions as unchanged and experienced no change in personal satisfaction. Further, new agents (n=33) who had joined the organization after implementation of the innovations did not appear to perceive the job dimensions and personal satisfaction differently from their experienced colleagues. Satisfaction with compensation and supervision improved, while satisfaction with co-worker relations declined, among those agents experiencing the work modifications. In addition, these agents were more satisfied with job security, compensation, and supervision than were their newer colleagues. It was concluded that, over the five-year period, implementation of issues-based programming and clustered work units had not altered Extension agent perceptions of core job dimensions or levels of job satisfaction, but may have affected some aspects of satisfaction with the work context. Advisor: John M. Dirkx

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The literature provides ample evidence that state Extension programs across the country are introducing new or modified program development approaches and reorganized work units as they attempt to remain responsive to the public's educational needs. Implementation of such innovations, in many instances, represents change in Extension agent roles and responsibilities which could be characterized as a redesign of Extension work. Research on the effects of job redesign has consistently found evidence that workers' perceptions of certain core dimensions or characteristics of their jobs influence their satisfaction with that job. Given the changing organizational climate within Extension and the findings of job redesign research, the present inquiry explored whether the introduction of organizational innovations changed Extension agent job perceptions and job satisfaction. Data from prior research with Nebraska Extension agents established a baseline of perceptions about the level of skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, feedback, personal satisfaction, and context satisfaction present in the job of agent. These observations, obtained before program development and work unit changes were implemented, were contrasted with agents' current perceptions of the same factors following introduction of organizational changes. The study findings suggested that agents (n=103) saw the job dimensions as unchanged and experienced no change in personal satisfaction. Further, new agents (n=33) who had joined the organization after implementation of the innovations did not appear to perceive the job dimensions and personal satisfaction differently from their experienced colleagues. Satisfaction with compensation and supervision improved, while satisfaction with co-worker relations declined, among those agents experiencing the work modifications. In addition, these agents were more satisfied with job security, compensation, and supervision than were their newer colleagues. It was concluded that, over the five-year period, implementation of issues-based programming and clustered work units had not altered Extension agent perceptions of core job dimensions or levels of job satisfaction, but may have affected some aspects of satisfaction with the work context. Advisor: John M. Dirkx

Key concepts: Job satisfaction, Job attitude, Job design, Personnel psychology, Job analysis, Psychology, Context (archaeology), Job performance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Changes in Extension Educators' Perceptions of Job Dimensions and Job satisfaction Following Organizational Restructuring — Research Paper | ScholarLens