[Stroke volume variation in the evaluation of fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock].
Hongmin Zhang, Dawei Liu, Xiaoting Wang, Rui Xi, Hao Wang, Huaiwu He, Ye Liu, Xiukai Chen
Abstract
Hongmin Zhang, Dawei Liu, Xiaoting Wang, Rui Xi, Hao Wang, Huaiwu He, Ye Liu, Xiukai Chen
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation(SVV) in mechanically ventilated patients with refractory septic shock. METHODS: Forty-two refractory septic shock patients were enrolled in the study. According to the responsiveness of fluid loading, the patients were divided into responsive group and non-responsive group. The SVV values of two groups were retrospectively analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drafted to determine the cut-off value of SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: Among the 42 refractory septic shock patients, 24 were found responsive to fluid loading, 18 were not; before the fluid loading, central venous pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and global end-diastolic volume index in the both groups showed no significant differences whereas the SVV in the responsive group was much higher than that in the nonresponsive group (P=0.006). Using SVV≥12% as the threshold to predict fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity was 77%, specificity was 85%. CONCLUSION: SVV can accurately predict fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock patients.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation(SVV) in mechanically ventilated patients with refractory septic shock. METHODS: Forty-two refractory septic shock patients were enrolled in the study. According to the responsiveness of fluid loading, the patients were divided into responsive group and non-responsive group. The SVV values of two groups were retrospectively analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drafted to determine the cut-off value of SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: Among the 42 refractory septic shock patients, 24 were found responsive to fluid loading, 18 were not; before the fluid loading, central venous pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and global end-diastolic volume index in the both groups showed no significant differences whereas the SVV in the responsive group was much higher than that in the nonresponsive group (P=0.006). Using SVV≥12% as the threshold to predict fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity was 77%, specificity was 85%. CONCLUSION: SVV can accurately predict fluid responsiveness in refractory septic shock patients.
Key concepts: Medicine, Septic shock, Stroke volume, Refractory (planetary science), Shock (circulatory), Central venous pressure, Cardiology, Stroke (engine)