2005•Unpublished venueRequires access

Air Force Space Doctrine: Is It Ready for Weapons in Space?

Charles P. Corley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The U.S. Air Force sometimes appears to have two identities. Not only is the U.S. Air Force arguably the best air-breathing air force in the world, it is also steward to the predominance of the nation's military space power. Because of the increased emphasis and importance of space to the warfighter, the U.S. is poised to put weapons in space to protect its satellite assets. Once space is weaponized, it is not beyond plausibility that the leap from defensive to offensive space-based weapons will occur. Within the U.S. Air Force itself, there are those who feel that the two mediums of air and space do not belong under the umbrella of a single service. Many in the space community feel that current space doctrine is stifled under the air-centric Air Force. Additionally, argument abounds that the Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) should not have Air Force space assets under his control but that they should be under the control of a more space-minded (read additional) component commander. This paper addresses the possibility and unique advantages of offensive weapons in space. It further looks at current Air Force space doctrine and its applicability to offensive space-based weapons. Instead of finding a rift between air and space forces and doctrine, this paper finds that U.S. Air Force space doctrine is already well structured to support offensive space weapons and the JFACC who should and will be using them. The Air Force understands the unique characteristics of each medium but more importantly, understands these differences do not matter in the realm of force application.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The U.S. Air Force sometimes appears to have two identities. Not only is the U.S. Air Force arguably the best air-breathing air force in the world, it is also steward to the predominance of the nation's military space power. Because of the increased emphasis and importance of space to the warfighter, the U.S. is poised to put weapons in space to protect its satellite assets. Once space is weaponized, it is not beyond plausibility that the leap from defensive to offensive space-based weapons will occur. Within the U.S. Air Force itself, there are those who feel that the two mediums of air and space do not belong under the umbrella of a single service. Many in the space community feel that current space doctrine is stifled under the air-centric Air Force. Additionally, argument abounds that the Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) should not have Air Force space assets under his control but that they should be under the control of a more space-minded (read additional) component commander. This paper addresses the possibility and unique advantages of offensive weapons in space. It further looks at current Air Force space doctrine and its applicability to offensive space-based weapons. Instead of finding a rift between air and space forces and doctrine, this paper finds that U.S. Air Force space doctrine is already well structured to support offensive space weapons and the JFACC who should and will be using them. The Air Force understands the unique characteristics of each medium but more importantly, understands these differences do not matter in the realm of force application.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The U.S. Air Force sometimes appears to have two identities. Not only is the U.S. Air Force arguably the best air-breathing air force in the world, it is also steward to the predominance of the nation's military space power. Because of the increased emphasis and importance of space to the warfighter, the U.S. is poised to put weapons in space to protect its satellite assets. Once space is weaponized, it is not beyond plausibility that the leap from defensive to offensive space-based weapons will occur. Within the U.S. Air Force itself, there are those who feel that the two mediums of air and space do not belong under the umbrella of a single service. Many in the space community feel that current space doctrine is stifled under the air-centric Air Force. Additionally, argument abounds that the Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) should not have Air Force space assets under his control but that they should be under the control of a more space-minded (read additional) component commander. This paper addresses the possibility and unique advantages of offensive weapons in space. It further looks at current Air Force space doctrine and its applicability to offensive space-based weapons. Instead of finding a rift between air and space forces and doctrine, this paper finds that U.S. Air Force space doctrine is already well structured to support offensive space weapons and the JFACC who should and will be using them. The Air Force understands the unique characteristics of each medium but more importantly, understands these differences do not matter in the realm of force application.

Key concepts: Space (punctuation), Doctrine, Aeronautics, Computer security, Aerospace engineering, Physics, Computer science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Air Force Space Doctrine: Is It Ready for Weapons in Space? — Research Paper | ScholarLens