Raising Standards and Measuring Performance Equitably: Challenges for the National Education Goals Panel and State Assessment Systems.
Cynthia D. Prince, Pascal D. Forgione
Abstract
Cynthia D. Prince, Pascal D. Forgione
Abstract
Approaches to equitable performance standards and assessment are discussed with three points of focus. First, the work of the National Education Goals Panel is described, with particular attention to Goal 3, Student Achievement and Citizenship, and the Panel's efforts to establish world-class standards performance. National standards are assumed to include content standards, student performance standards, school delivery standards, and system performance standards. Second, four possible approaches to standard-setting for students with special needs are presented. They include the following: one standard for everybody; same standard, different conditions; different standards for different groups; and exclusion of some groups from assessment altogether. Potential advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed. Third, a discussion of how states are reacting to the national interest in standard-setting and assessments focuses on the standards-based approach to educational improvement adopted in Delaware. The New Directions for Education in Delaware reform plan adopted in May, 1992, clearly defines a strategy of educational standards and related assessments and accountability that will define the nature of educational change needed if Delaware students are to be prepared for life in the 21st century. Four Delaware Curriculum Framework Commissions (English/language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies) participate in the standards development. Contains 7 references. (LB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Raising Standards and Measuring Performance Equitably: Challenges for the National Education Goals Padel and State Assessment Systems U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CRC. CA Educe( one' Research and Im Wessman( EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER &MCI ms 00Curnint has been ',product/1 as Owed from the bereOn or cagenaahon ong,naung Minor changes hey] Dean 0110, (0 MOrOdiKtiOn gusloty Points of wow or opmeons slated in IMS doc tr mint go MI necissaerfly represent Official OE RI pompon or policy Cynthia D. Prince, National Education Goals Panel Pascal D. Eorgione, Jr., Delaware Department of Public Instruction PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Approaches to equitable performance standards and assessment are discussed with three points of focus. First, the work of the National Education Goals Panel is described, with particular attention to Goal 3, Student Achievement and Citizenship, and the Panel's efforts to establish world-class standards performance. National standards are assumed to include content standards, student performance standards, school delivery standards, and system performance standards. Second, four possible approaches to standard-setting for students with special needs are presented. They include the following: one standard for everybody; same standard, different conditions; different standards for different groups; and exclusion of some groups from assessment altogether. Potential advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed. Third, a discussion of how states are reacting to the national interest in standard-setting and assessments focuses on the standards-based approach to educational improvement adopted in Delaware. The New Directions for Education in Delaware reform plan adopted in May, 1992, clearly defines a strategy of educational standards and related assessments and accountability that will define the nature of educational change needed if Delaware students are to be prepared for life in the 21st century. Four Delaware Curriculum Framework Commissions (English/language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies) participate in the standards development. Contains 7 references. (LB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Raising Standards and Measuring Performance Equitably: Challenges for the National Education Goals Padel and State Assessment Systems U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CRC. CA Educe( one' Research and Im Wessman( EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER &MCI ms 00Curnint has been ',product/1 as Owed from the bereOn or cagenaahon ong,naung Minor changes hey] Dean 0110, (0 MOrOdiKtiOn gusloty Points of wow or opmeons slated in IMS doc tr mint go MI necissaerfly represent Official OE RI pompon or policy Cynthia D. Prince, National Education Goals Panel Pascal D. Eorgione, Jr., Delaware Department of Public Instruction PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).
Key concepts: National Science Education Standards, Learning standards, Standards-based assessment, Accountability, Academic standards, Curriculum, Political science, Standardized test