2011Transportation Research Board 90th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Compaction of Granular Soils Using Superpave Gyratory Compactor at Higher Confining Pressures

Michael Panko, Jeremy Stevenson, Casey Hurt, Sean Coffey, Kevin McGarvey, Yusuf Mehta, Beena Sukumaran

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Post construction densification of subbase material underneath flexible asphalt surfaces is believed to lead to the failure of pavements. The compaction characteristics for granular soils have been tested for decades using standard ASTM testing methods such as the Modified Proctor test. In an attempt to find an acceptable alternative testing method, base and subbase materials were tested using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC). The Modified Proctor test is the current standard method for determining the optimal moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry density of soils. However, only vertical work is done on the soil sample with this method. When the SGC is used to compact granular soils, vertical work is complemented by shear work applied to the soil sample due to the gyration angle. Effects of the combination of vertical and shear work on final density were examined analytically by observing compaction curves and final densities. The confining pressure and number of gyrations were the varied parameters. Densities achieved with the SGC were compared to the densities found using the Modified Proctor. With reliable field data, relatively high confining pressures and gyration counts could be used to simulate construction and trafficking of pavements experiencing higher loads. Increasing the number of gyrations appears to increase the densification of subbase materials. When increasing the confining pressure applied to samples, an increase in densification of the materials is not immediately distinguishable indicating that most of the post construction densification of flexible pavements is due to shear work.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Post construction densification of subbase material underneath flexible asphalt surfaces is believed to lead to the failure of pavements. The compaction characteristics for granular soils have been tested for decades using standard ASTM testing methods such as the Modified Proctor test. In an attempt to find an acceptable alternative testing method, base and subbase materials were tested using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC). The Modified Proctor test is the current standard method for determining the optimal moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry density of soils. However, only vertical work is done on the soil sample with this method. When the SGC is used to compact granular soils, vertical work is complemented by shear work applied to the soil sample due to the gyration angle. Effects of the combination of vertical and shear work on final density were examined analytically by observing compaction curves and final densities. The confining pressure and number of gyrations were the varied parameters. Densities achieved with the SGC were compared to the densities found using the Modified Proctor. With reliable field data, relatively high confining pressures and gyration counts could be used to simulate construction and trafficking of pavements experiencing higher loads. Increasing the number of gyrations appears to increase the densification of subbase materials. When increasing the confining pressure applied to samples, an increase in densification of the materials is not immediately distinguishable indicating that most of the post construction densification of flexible pavements is due to shear work.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Post construction densification of subbase material underneath flexible asphalt surfaces is believed to lead to the failure of pavements. The compaction characteristics for granular soils have been tested for decades using standard ASTM testing methods such as the Modified Proctor test. In an attempt to find an acceptable alternative testing method, base and subbase materials were tested using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC). The Modified Proctor test is the current standard method for determining the optimal moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry density of soils. However, only vertical work is done on the soil sample with this method. When the SGC is used to compact granular soils, vertical work is complemented by shear work applied to the soil sample due to the gyration angle. Effects of the combination of vertical and shear work on final density were examined analytically by observing compaction curves and final densities. The confining pressure and number of gyrations were the varied parameters. Densities achieved with the SGC were compared to the densities found using the Modified Proctor. With reliable field data, relatively high confining pressures and gyration counts could be used to simulate construction and trafficking of pavements experiencing higher loads. Increasing the number of gyrations appears to increase the densification of subbase materials. When increasing the confining pressure applied to samples, an increase in densification of the materials is not immediately distinguishable indicating that most of the post construction densification of flexible pavements is due to shear work.

Key concepts: Subbase, Compaction, Gyration, Geotechnical engineering, Proctor compaction test, Soil water, Overburden pressure, Granular material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Compaction of Granular Soils Using Superpave Gyratory Compactor at Higher Confining Pressures — Research Paper | ScholarLens